355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28526112)
1. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific writing: the process and the pitfalls.
Byard RW
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):285-6. PubMed ID: 23832426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Authorship policy of the Journal of Korean Medical Science.
Hong ST
J Korean Med Sci; 2010 May; 25(5):657. PubMed ID: 20436697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The art and science of scientific writing.
Mestres CA; Sampathkumar A
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2019 Jun; 27(5):335-337. PubMed ID: 31188675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fast and Furious (?).
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Mar; 66(2):125. PubMed ID: 29510434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Five Modes of Sudden Death.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):277. PubMed ID: 29860717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing?
Parkinson L; Sims J
Australas J Ageing; 2017 Jun; 36(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 28635096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Consider the source.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Guidelines for writing journal articles in English.
Suh MH
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2004 Jun; 34(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 15502425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardization of reporting data in the 'Spinal cord' journal.
Wyndaele JJ
Spinal Cord; 2012 Jul; 50(7):483. PubMed ID: 22766555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editor's nitpicking.
Castillo M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2010 Sep; 31(8):1353-4. PubMed ID: 20203110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Standards in the face of uncertainty--peer review is flawed and under-researched, but the best we have.
Mertens S; Baethge C
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Dec; 109(51-52):900-2. PubMed ID: 23372614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiology in Korea: what is happening?
Jung JI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):637-8. PubMed ID: 18716086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
Klein JS; Harmon SP;
Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Why and how to avoid a desk-rejection.
Lake ET
Res Nurs Health; 2020 Apr; 43(2):141-142. PubMed ID: 32103510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review in Clinical Pharmacology using the 8-D Assessment.
Woodcock BG
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Mar; 55(3):201-200. PubMed ID: 28218890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
