355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28526112)
21. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors.
Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J
Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Writing a literature review article.
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 80(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 19005101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Are you a budding academic writer?
Grant MJ; Bonnett P; Sutton A; Marshall A; Murphy J; Spring H
Health Info Libr J; 2016 Mar; 33(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26995750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Editorial licence: what gets published and why.
McClure RJ
Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 24(2):105. PubMed ID: 29567805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Financial disclosure of reviewers.
Parameswaran K
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2003 Oct; 168(8):1010; author reply 1010. PubMed ID: 14555459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Writing the abstract: completeness and accuracy matter.
von Elm E
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):483-4. PubMed ID: 21659806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review).
Drubin DG
Mol Biol Cell; 2011 Mar; 22(5):525-7. PubMed ID: 21357757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.
Lovejoy TI; Revenson TA; France CR
Ann Behav Med; 2011 Aug; 42(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21505912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How to review a paper for Heart.
Otto CM
Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Preprints and Cardiovascular Science: Prescient or Premature?
Nallamothu BK; Hill JA
Circulation; 2017 Sep; 136(13):1177-1179. PubMed ID: 28912371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Boil it down…….
Curzon M
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(6):369-70. PubMed ID: 25412810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.
Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS
Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer Review in Transplantation.
Hutchinson JA
Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
Greaves M
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Restoring integrity to the scientific literature: lowering the bar to raise our standards.
Gordon SE
J Gen Physiol; 2014 Dec; 144(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 25422501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache.
Hesterman CM; Szperka CL; Turner DP
Headache; 2018 Nov; 58(10):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 30011058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality articles require peer reviewers as well as authors.
Mack A
J Manag Care Pharm; 2005 Mar; 11(2):186. PubMed ID: 15766327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
Elmore SA
Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reviewers' Role in Research.
Zareen N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Jul; 27(7):456. PubMed ID: 28818174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
