483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28526449)
1. Predictors of vaginal delivery in medically indicated early preterm induction of labor.
Sievert RA; Kuper SG; Jauk VC; Parrish M; Biggio JR; Harper LM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):375.e1-375.e7. PubMed ID: 28526449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period.
Mardy AH; Ananth CV; Grobman WA; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):513.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27262971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth After Induction of Labor in Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.
Beninati MJ; Ramos SZ; Danilack VA; Has P; Savitz DA; Werner EF
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):402-410. PubMed ID: 32649502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery.
Coviello EM; Iqbal SN; Grantz KL; Huang CC; Landy HJ; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):100.e1-100.e9. PubMed ID: 30273585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for Cesarean delivery in pregnancy with small-for-gestational-age fetus undergoing induction of labor.
Nwabuobi C; Gowda N; Schmitz J; Wood N; Pargas A; Bagiardi L; Odibo L; Camisasca-Lopina H; Kuznicki M; Sinkey R; Odibo A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 31441151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labor induction or elective cesarean delivery?
Nassar AH; Adra AM; Chakhtoura N; Gómez-Marín O; Beydoun S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 179(5):1210-3. PubMed ID: 9822502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies-a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
Aviram A; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E; Yoon EW; Melamed N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 231(1):124.e1-124.e11. PubMed ID: 37979823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.
Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning.
Lipschuetz M; Guedalia J; Rottenstreich A; Novoselsky Persky M; Cohen SM; Kabiri D; Levin G; Yagel S; Unger R; Sompolinsky Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):613.e1-613.e12. PubMed ID: 32007491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery Among Women Undergoing Induction of Labor.
Rossi RM; Requarth E; Warshak CR; Dufendach KR; Hall ES; DeFranco EA
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 135(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 32028500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy.
Kamel RA; Negm SM; Youssef A; Bianchini L; Brunelli E; Pilu G; Soliman M; Nicolaides KH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):609.e1-609.e11. PubMed ID: 33412128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy.
Vahanian SA; Hoffman MK; Ananth CV; Croft DJ; Duzyj C; Fuchs KM; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Kinzler WL; Plante LA; Ranzini AC; Rosen TJ; Skupski DW; Smulian JC; Vintzileos AM;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 221(1):61.e1-61.e7. PubMed ID: 30802437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length.
Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 May; 17(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 16147844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Externally Validated Prediction Model of Vaginal Delivery After Preterm Induction With Unfavorable Cervix.
Kawakita T; Reddy UM; Huang JC; Auguste TC; Bauer D; Overcash RT
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):716-724. PubMed ID: 32925613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
Levine LD; Downes KL; Parry S; Elovitz MA; Sammel MD; Srinivas SK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2):254.e1-254.e7. PubMed ID: 29224730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
