251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28527357)
41. SILVER versus other antimicrobial dressings: best practices!
Woo KY; Ayello EA; Sibbald RG
Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():50-71. PubMed ID: 18802883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Electrospinning of natural polymers for the production of nanofibres for wound healing applications.
Juncos Bombin AD; Dunne NJ; McCarthy HO
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Sep; 114():110994. PubMed ID: 32993991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Use of honey dressings in wound healing].
Nizet O; Camby S; Nizet JL
Rev Med Liege; 2020 Dec; 75(12):797-801. PubMed ID: 33331704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Natural Polymer-Based Antimicrobial Hydrogels without Synthetic Antibiotics as Wound Dressings.
Zhong Y; Xiao H; Seidi F; Jin Y
Biomacromolecules; 2020 Aug; 21(8):2983-3006. PubMed ID: 32672446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Perspectives of nanofibrous wound dressings based on glucans and galactans - A review.
Latiyan S; Kumar TSS; Doble M; Kennedy JF
Int J Biol Macromol; 2023 Jul; 244():125358. PubMed ID: 37330091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Electrospinning Proteins for Wound Healing Purposes: Opportunities and Challenges.
Akhmetova A; Heinz A
Pharmaceutics; 2020 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 33374930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: A review.
Simões D; Miguel SP; Ribeiro MP; Coutinho P; Mendonça AG; Correia IJ
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2018 Jun; 127():130-141. PubMed ID: 29462687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Electrospun Asymmetric Membranes as Promising Wound Dressings: A Review.
Graça MFP; de Melo-Diogo D; Correia IJ; Moreira AF
Pharmaceutics; 2021 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 33573313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Wound-dressing materials with antibacterial activity from electrospun polyurethane-dextran nanofiber mats containing ciprofloxacin HCl.
Unnithan AR; Barakat NA; Pichiah PB; Gnanasekaran G; Nirmala R; Cha YS; Jung CH; El-Newehy M; Kim HY
Carbohydr Polym; 2012 Nov; 90(4):1786-93. PubMed ID: 22944448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Formation and Biopharmaceutical Characterization of Electrospun PVP Mats with Propolis and Silver Nanoparticles for Fast Releasing Wound Dressing.
Adomavičiūtė E; Stanys S; Žilius M; Juškaitė V; Pavilonis A; Briedis V
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():4648287. PubMed ID: 26981531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Electrospun nanofibrous polymeric scaffold with targeted drug release profiles for potential application as wound dressing.
Thakur RA; Florek CA; Kohn J; Michniak BB
Int J Pharm; 2008 Nov; 364(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 18771719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Development and characterization of a novel, antimicrobial, sterile hydrogel dressing for burn wounds: single-step production with gamma irradiation creates silver nanoparticles and radical polymerization.
Boonkaew B; Barber PM; Rengpipat S; Supaphol P; Kempf M; He J; John VT; Cuttle L
J Pharm Sci; 2014 Oct; 103(10):3244-53. PubMed ID: 25079080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Antimicrobial peptides expressed in medicinal maggots of the blow fly Lucilia sericata show combinatorial activity against bacteria.
Pöppel AK; Vogel H; Wiesner J; Vilcinskas A
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2015 May; 59(5):2508-14. PubMed ID: 25666157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Role of polymeric biomaterials as wound healing agents.
Agrawal P; Soni S; Mittal G; Bhatnagar A
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2014 Sep; 13(3):180-90. PubMed ID: 25056991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Standardizing an in vitro procedure for the evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of wound dressings and the assessment of three wound dressings.
Tkachenko O; Karas JA
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2012 Jul; 67(7):1697-700. PubMed ID: 22514261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of dense collagen matrices as medicated wound dressing for the treatment of cutaneous chronic wounds.
Helary C; Abed A; Mosser G; Louedec L; Letourneur D; Coradin T; Giraud-Guille MM; Meddahi-Pellé A
Biomater Sci; 2015 Feb; 3(2):373-82. PubMed ID: 26218128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. In vitro assessment of the antimicrobial activity of wound dressings: influence of the test method selected and impact of the pH.
Wiegand C; Abel M; Ruth P; Elsner P; Hipler UC
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Jan; 26(1):5343. PubMed ID: 25578697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Emerging Trends in Therapeutic Algorithm of Chronic Wound Healers: Recent Advances in Drug Delivery Systems, Concepts-to-Clinical Application and Future Prospects.
Shao M; Hussain Z; Thu HE; Khan S; de Matas M; Silkstone V; Qin HL; Bukhari SNA
Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst; 2017; 34(5):387-452. PubMed ID: 29256838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. An Update on Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs) and Their Delivery Strategies for Wound Infections.
Patrulea V; Borchard G; Jordan O
Pharmaceutics; 2020 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32887353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for drug delivery applications.
Hu X; Liu S; Zhou G; Huang Y; Xie Z; Jing X
J Control Release; 2014 Jul; 185():12-21. PubMed ID: 24768792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
