BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28527794)

  • 1. Farmers' preferences for automatic lameness-detection systems in dairy cattle.
    Van De Gucht T; Saeys W; Van Nuffel A; Pluym L; Piccart K; Lauwers L; Vangeyte J; Van Weyenberg S
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5746-5757. PubMed ID: 28527794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lameness on Brazilian pasture based dairies-part 1: Farmers' awareness and actions.
    Bran JA; Daros RR; von Keyserlingk MAG; Hötzel MJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Sep; 157():134-141. PubMed ID: 30086841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lameness in dairy cows: farmer perceptions and automated detection technology.
    Dutton-Regester KJ; Barnes TS; Wright JD; Rabiee AR
    J Dairy Res; 2020 Aug; 87(S1):67-71. PubMed ID: 33213572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supporting the Development and Adoption of Automatic Lameness Detection Systems in Dairy Cattle: Effect of System Cost and Performance on Potential Market Shares.
    Van De Gucht T; Van Weyenberg S; Van Nuffel A; Lauwers L; Vangeyte J; Saeys W
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Oct; 7(10):. PubMed ID: 28991188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can lameness prevalence in dairy herds be predicted from farmers' reports of their motivation to control lameness and barriers to doing so? An observational study from New Zealand.
    Mason WA; Laven LJ; Huxley JN; Laven RA
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Apr; 107(4):2332-2345. PubMed ID: 37863289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lameness on Brazilian pasture based dairies - Part 2: Conversations with farmers and dairy consultants.
    Olmos G; Bran JA; von Keyserlingk MAG; Hötzel MJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Sep; 157():115-124. PubMed ID: 30086839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the value dairy farmers place on a reduction of lameness in their herds using a willingness to pay approach.
    Bennett RM; Barker ZE; Main DC; Whay HR; Leach KA
    Vet J; 2014 Jan; 199(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 24268682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Farmers' perceptions and approaches to detection, treatment and prevention of lameness in pasture-based dairy herds in New South Wales, Australia.
    Ranjbar S; Rabiee AR; Ingenhoff L; House JK
    Aust Vet J; 2020 Jun; 98(6):264-269. PubMed ID: 32157687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analyzing the heterogeneity of farmers' preferences for improvements in dairy cow traits using farmer typologies.
    Martin-Collado D; Byrne TJ; Amer PR; Santos BF; Axford M; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4148-61. PubMed ID: 25864048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Farm-specific economic value of automatic lameness detection systems in dairy cattle: From concepts to operational simulations.
    Van De Gucht T; Saeys W; Van Meensel J; Van Nuffel A; Vangeyte J; Lauwers L
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):637-648. PubMed ID: 29102143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lame cows on Australian dairy farms: A comparison of farmer-identified lameness and formal lameness scoring, and the position of lame cows within the milking order.
    Beggs DS; Jongman EC; Hemsworth PH; Fisher AD
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Feb; 102(2):1522-1529. PubMed ID: 30594372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of novel sensors combining local positioning and acceleration to measure feeding behavior differences associated with lameness in dairy cattle.
    Barker ZE; Vázquez Diosdado JA; Codling EA; Bell NJ; Hodges HR; Croft DP; Amory JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jul; 101(7):6310-6321. PubMed ID: 29705427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying additive logistic regression to data derived from sensors monitoring behavioral and physiological characteristics of dairy cows to detect lameness.
    Kamphuis C; Frank E; Burke JK; Verkerk GA; Jago JG
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(11):7043-7053. PubMed ID: 24011945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental and cow-related factors affect cow locomotion and can cause misclassification in lameness detection systems.
    Van Nuffel A; Van De Gucht T; Saeys W; Sonck B; Opsomer G; Vangeyte J; Mertens KC; De Ketelaere B; Van Weyenberg S
    Animal; 2016 Sep; 10(9):1533-41. PubMed ID: 26584890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 2. Understanding dairy farmers' motivations.
    Leach KA; Whay HR; Maggs CM; Barker ZE; Paul ES; Bell AK; Main DC
    Res Vet Sci; 2010 Oct; 89(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 20413137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Farm-level risk factors and treatment protocols for lameness in New Zealand dairy cattle.
    Mason WA; Müller KR; Laven LJ; Huxley JN; Laven RA
    N Z Vet J; 2024 Jul; 72(4):171-182. PubMed ID: 38719276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accurate detection of lameness in dairy cattle with computer vision: A new and individualized detection strategy based on the analysis of the supporting phase.
    Kang X; Zhang XD; Liu G
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Nov; 103(11):10628-10638. PubMed ID: 32952030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Invited review: Cattle lameness detection with accelerometers.
    O'Leary NW; Byrne DT; O'Connor AH; Shalloo L
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 May; 103(5):3895-3911. PubMed ID: 32113761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dairy Farmers' Perceptions of and Actions in Relation to Lameness Management.
    Babatunde SM; Ramanoon SZ; Shaik Mossadeq WM; Mansor R; Syed Hussain SS
    Animals (Basel); 2019 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 31126064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individualised automated lameness detection in dairy cows and the impact of historical window length on algorithm performance.
    Piette D; Norton T; Exadaktylos V; Berckmans D
    Animal; 2020 Feb; 14(2):409-417. PubMed ID: 31354111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.