These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
800 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28528016)
1. The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Oct; 26(10):1726-1731. PubMed ID: 28528016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study. Arenas-Miquelez A; Murphy RJ; Rosa A; Caironi D; Zumstein MA J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):763-771. PubMed ID: 32763384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis. Keener JD; Patterson BM; Orvets N; Aleem AW; Chamberlain AM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Feb; 27(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 29332666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjusting Implant Size and Position Can Improve Internal Rotation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Three-dimensional Computational Model. Huish EG; Athwal GS; Neyton L; Walch G Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 33044311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is preoperative 3D planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Gauci MO; Glevarec L; Bronsard N; Cointat C; Pelletier Y; Boileau P; Gonzalez JF J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Aug; 33(8):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 38281677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study. Franceschetti E; Ranieri R; Giovanetti de Sanctis E; Palumbo A; Franceschi F J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31401130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Boileau P; Farron A; Deransart P; Walch G Int Orthop; 2018 Jun; 42(6):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 29492611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inferior tilt of the glenoid leads to medialization and increases impingement on the scapular neck in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patel M; Martin JR; Campbell DH; Fernandes RR; Amini MH J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jun; 30(6):1273-1281. PubMed ID: 33069903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of constrained humeral liner on impingement-free range of motion and impingement type in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a computer simulation. Nakazawa K; Manaka T; Minoda Y; Hirakawa Y; Ito Y; Iio R; Nakamura H J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; 33(1):181-191. PubMed ID: 37598837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid-term comparative study between the glenoid and humerus lateralization designs for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: which lateralization design is better? Lee HH; Park SE; Ji JH; Jun HS BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):290. PubMed ID: 37059977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion. Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Gauci MO; Seeto BL; Chalmers PN; Holzer N; Walch G J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Dec; 26(12):2133-2142. PubMed ID: 28735842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of the humeral neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization on stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Ferle M; Pastor MF; Hagenah J; Hurschler C; Smith T J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 May; 28(5):966-973. PubMed ID: 30626537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Boileau P; Farron A; Deransart P; Terrier A; Ston J; Walch G Int Orthop; 2015 Nov; 39(11):2205-13. PubMed ID: 26381907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of impingement-free range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using three different implant models. Kim SJ; Jang SW; Jung KH; Kim YS; Lee SJ; Yoo YS J Orthop Sci; 2019 Jan; 24(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 30268356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of humeral stem and glenosphere designs on range of motion and muscle length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Collin P; Zbinden O; Chiu JC; Boileau P; Olivier F; Walch G Int Orthop; 2020 Mar; 44(3):519-530. PubMed ID: 31900574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of glenoid component version and humeral polyethylene liner rotation on subluxation and impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Permeswaran VN; Caceres A; Goetz JE; Anderson DD; Hettrich CM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Oct; 26(10):1718-1725. PubMed ID: 28545718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle: a new measurement of glenoid inclination for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Boileau P; Gauci MO; Wagner ER; Clowez G; Chaoui J; Chelli M; Walch G J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 30935825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]