These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28528147)

  • 1. Variability and Reproducibility of Segmental Longitudinal Strain Measurement: A Report From the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.
    Mirea O; Pagourelias ED; Duchenne J; Bogaert J; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU;
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 28528147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intervendor Differences in the Accuracy of Detecting Regional Functional Abnormalities: A Report From the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.
    Mirea O; Pagourelias ED; Duchenne J; Bogaert J; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU;
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 28528162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility of Layer-Specific Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements Among Five Different Vendors: A Report from the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.
    Ünlü S; Mirea O; Duchenne J; Pagourelias ED; Bézy S; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Mar; 31(3):374-380.e1. PubMed ID: 29246512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Layer-Specific Segmental Longitudinal Strain Measurements: Capability of Detecting Myocardial Scar and Differences in Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility, Among Four Vendors A Report From the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.
    Ünlü S; Mirea O; Pagourelias ED; Duchenne J; Bézy S; Bogaert J; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU;
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2019 May; 32(5):624-632.e11. PubMed ID: 30878251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global longitudinal strain software upgrade: Implications for intervendor consistency and longitudinal imaging studies.
    Castel AL; Menet A; Ennezat PV; Delelis F; Le Goffic C; Binda C; Guerbaai RA; Levy F; Graux P; Tribouilloy C; Maréchaux S
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Jan; 109(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26514326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intervendor consistency and reproducibility of left ventricular 2D global and regional strain with two different high-end ultrasound systems.
    Shiino K; Yamada A; Ischenko M; Khandheria BK; Hudaverdi M; Speranza V; Harten M; Benjamin A; Hamilton-Craig CR; Platts DG; Burstow DJ; Scalia GM; Chan J
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 18(6):707-716. PubMed ID: 27330151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility and Intervendor Agreement of Left Ventricular Global Systolic Strain in Children Using a Layer-Specific Analysis.
    Ramlogan S; Aly D; France R; Schmidt S; Hinzman J; Sherman A; Goudar SP; Forsha D
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2020 Jan; 33(1):110-119. PubMed ID: 31668503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intervendor variability of two-dimensional strain using vendor-specific and vendor-independent software.
    Nagata Y; Takeuchi M; Mizukoshi K; Wu VC; Lin FC; Negishi K; Nakatani S; Otsuji Y
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Jun; 28(6):630-41. PubMed ID: 25747915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Head-to-Head Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements among Nine Different Vendors: The EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study.
    Farsalinos KE; Daraban AM; Ünlü S; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1171-1181, e2. PubMed ID: 26209911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards standardized postprocessing of global longitudinal strain by feature tracking - OptiStrain CMR-FT study.
    Heinke R; Pathan F; Le M; D'Angelo T; Winau L; Arendt C; Vogl TJ; Zeiher A; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Nov; 19(1):267. PubMed ID: 31775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of global left ventricular deformation analysis using vendor dependent and independent two-dimensional speckle-tracking software in adults.
    Risum N; Ali S; Olsen NT; Jons C; Khouri MG; Lauridsen TK; Samad Z; Velazquez EJ; Sogaard P; Kisslo J
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Nov; 25(11):1195-203. PubMed ID: 22981228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-vendor variability in strain measurements depends on software rather than image characteristics.
    Ünlü S; Mirea O; Bézy S; Duchenne J; Pagourelias ED; Bogaert J; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU; ;
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 May; 37(5):1689-1697. PubMed ID: 33454899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal two-dimensional strain for the diagnosis of left ventricular segmental dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Eitan A; Kehat I; Mutlak D; Lichtenberg G; Amar D; Agmon Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Feb; 34(2):237-249. PubMed ID: 28825162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-vendor reproducibility and accuracy of segmental left ventricular strain measurements using CMR feature tracking.
    Dobrovie M; Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6846-6857. PubMed ID: 31297633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multilayer global longitudinal strain in patients with cancer: A comparison of two vendors.
    Ancedy Y; Ederhy S; Lang S; Hollebecque A; Dufour LS; Adavane-Scheuble S; Etienney A; Chauvet M; Soria JC; Cohen A
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018 Apr; 111(4):285-296. PubMed ID: 29422386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment: Are CMR feature-tracking algorithms useful in the clinical setting?
    Pierpaolo P; Rolf S; Manuel BP; Davide C; Dresselaers T; Claus P; Bogaert J
    Radiol Med; 2020 May; 125(5):444-450. PubMed ID: 32125636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement in Strain Concordance between Two Major Vendors after the Strain Standardization Initiative.
    Yang H; Marwick TH; Fukuda N; Oe H; Saito M; Thomas JD; Negishi K
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Jun; 28(6):642-8.e7. PubMed ID: 25636366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
    Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility and inter-vendor variability of left ventricular deformation measurements by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography.
    Gayat E; Ahmad H; Weinert L; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Aug; 24(8):878-85. PubMed ID: 21645991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of left ventricular manual versus automated derived longitudinal strain: implications for clinical practice and research.
    Kobayashi Y; Ariyama M; Kobayashi Y; Giraldeau G; Fleischman D; Kozelj M; Vrtovec B; Ashley E; Kuznetsova T; Schnittger I; Liang D; Haddad F
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 26578468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.