134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28528467)
1. Changes in deviation of absorbed dose to water among users by chamber calibration shift.
Katayose T; Saitoh H; Igari M; Chang W; Hashimoto S; Morioka M
Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):389-397. PubMed ID: 28528467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ionization chamber dosimetry based on
Araki F; Ohno T; Umeno S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185018. PubMed ID: 30101751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical calibration dosimetry in JSMP-01: measurements using plane-parallel ion chambers.].
Araki F; Kumagai K; Yoshiura T; Oura H; Tachibana M; Moribe N; Tajima H; Yoshida A; Kido T
Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(3):114-23. PubMed ID: 16373987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Uncertainty of cross calibration-applied beam quality conversion factor for the Japan Society of Medical Physics 12].
Kinoshita N; Kita A; Takemura A; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Sep; 70(9):877-82. PubMed ID: 25242596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Outline of standard dosimetry of absorbed dose to water in external beam radiotherapy].
Saitoh H
Igaku Butsuri; 2013; 33(4):171-8. PubMed ID: 24893492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical calibration dosimetry in JSMP-01: measurements using Farmer-type cylindrical ion chambers.].
Araki F; Kumagai K; Yoshiura T; Oura H; Tachibana M; Moribe N; Tajima H; Yoshida A; Kido T
Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(3):104-13. PubMed ID: 16373986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Development of the 60Co gamma-ray standard field for therapy-level dosimeter calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water (N(D,w))].
Fukumura A; Mizuno H; Fukahori M; Sakata S
Igaku Butsuri; 2012; 32(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 24568023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.
Arib M; Medjadj T; Boudouma Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 7(3):55-64. PubMed ID: 17533342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proton dosimetry intercomparison.
Vatnitsky S; Siebers J; Miller D; Moyers M; Schaefer M; Jones D; Vynckier S; Hayakawa Y; Delacroix S; Isacsson U; Medin J; Kacperek A; Lomax A; Coray A; Kluge H; Heese J; Verhey L; Daftari I; Gall K; Lam G; Beck T; Hartmann G
Radiother Oncol; 1996 Nov; 41(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 9004361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction of stopping power and LET quenching for radiophotoluminescent glass dosimetry in a therapeutic proton beam.
Chang W; Koba Y; Katayose T; Yasui K; Omachi C; Hariu M; Saitoh H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(23):8869-8881. PubMed ID: 28980978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams.
Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA
Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Absorbed dose measurement of photon beam with Farmer-type ionization chambers in Japanese dosimetry protocols].
Fujisaki T; Hiraoka T; Osawa A; Nakajima M; Kuwabara A; Yokoyama K; Saitoh H; Tomaru T; Inada T
Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15226645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ion chamber absorbed dose calibration coefficients, N(D,w), measured at ADCLs: distribution analysis and stability.
Muir BR
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1546-54. PubMed ID: 25832045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of absorbed dose-to-water for an HDR (192)Ir source with ionization chambers in a sandwich setup.
Araki F; Kouno T; Ohno T; Kakei K; Yoshiyama F; Kawamura S
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):092101. PubMed ID: 24007170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
