These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28528467)

  • 21. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams.
    Bouchard H; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2454-65. PubMed ID: 15487725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
    Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Air kerma based dosimetry calibration for the Leksell Gamma Knife.
    Meltsner SG; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):339-50. PubMed ID: 19291973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The characterization of the Advanced Markus ionization chamber for use in reference electron dosimetry in the UK.
    Pearce J; Thomas R; Dusautoy A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):473-83. PubMed ID: 16424576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.
    McEwen MR
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2179-93. PubMed ID: 20527552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correction factors for source strength determination in HDR brachytherapy using the in-phantom method.
    Ubrich F; Wulff J; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2014 May; 24(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 24021956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
    Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
    Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Direct determination of k
    Osinga-Blättermann JM; Brons S; Greilich S; Jäkel O; Krauss A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2033-2054. PubMed ID: 28212111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Water-energy dosage calibration and standard ion dosage calibration--a comparison in ultrahard x-ray radiation].
    Christ G; Nüsslin F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1990 Apr; 166(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 2109878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Water calorimetry in MR-linac: Direct measurement of absorbed dose and determination of chamber
    D'Souza M; Nusrat H; Iakovenko V; Keller B; Sahgal A; Renaud J; Sarfehnia A
    Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6458-6469. PubMed ID: 32970325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [National primary standard of absorbed dose rate to water using a graphite calorimeter].
    Morishita Y
    Igaku Butsuri; 2013; 33(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 24893493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Calibration of helical tomotherapy machine using EPR/alanine dosimetry.
    Perichon N; Garcia T; François P; Lourenço V; Lesven C; Bordy JM
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1168-77. PubMed ID: 21520829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
    Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.