208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28528791)
1. MicroCT-based finite element models as a tool for virtual testing of cortical bone.
Ramezanzadehkoldeh M; Skallerud BH
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():12-20. PubMed ID: 28528791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-invasive prediction of the mouse tibia mechanical properties from microCT images: comparison between different finite element models.
Oliviero S; Roberts M; Owen R; Reilly GC; Bellantuono I; Dall'Ara E
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):941-955. PubMed ID: 33523337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of HR-pQCT- and microCT-based finite element models for the estimation of the mechanical properties of the calcaneus trabecular bone.
Alsayednoor J; Metcalf L; Rochester J; Dall'Ara E; McCloskey E; Lacroix D
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1715-1730. PubMed ID: 29987700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Micro-finite-element method to assess elastic properties of trabecular bone at micro- and macroscopic level.
Rieger R; Auregan JC; Hoc T
Morphologie; 2018 Mar; 102(336):12-20. PubMed ID: 28893491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of beam theory for estimating bone tissue modulus and yield stress from 3-point bending tests on rat femora.
Arias-Moreno AJ; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 101():109654. PubMed ID: 32007225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of bone microstructure on the mechanical properties of skull cortical bone - A combined experimental and computational approach.
Boruah S; Subit DL; Paskoff GR; Shender BS; Crandall JR; Salzar RS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():688-704. PubMed ID: 27743944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of the Young's modulus of the human pars tensa using in-situ pressurization and inverse finite-element analysis.
Rohani SA; Ghomashchi S; Agrawal SK; Ladak HM
Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():69-78. PubMed ID: 28087415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of finite element models of the mouse tibia using digital volume correlation.
Oliviero S; Giorgi M; Dall'Ara E
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Oct; 86():172-184. PubMed ID: 29986291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intravoxel bone micromechanics for microCT-based finite element simulations.
Blanchard R; Dejaco A; Bongaers E; Hellmich C
J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2710-21. PubMed ID: 24016680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing finite element predictions of local subchondral bone structural stiffness using neural network-derived density-modulus relationships for proximal tibial subchondral cortical and trabecular bone.
Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Jan; 41():1-8. PubMed ID: 27842233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanics of callus in the bone healing process, determined by specimen-specific finite element analysis.
Suzuki T; Matsuura Y; Yamazaki T; Akasaka T; Ozone E; Matsuyama Y; Mukai M; Ohara T; Wakita H; Taniguchi S; Ohtori S
Bone; 2020 Mar; 132():115212. PubMed ID: 31891786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In situ parameter identification of optimal density-elastic modulus relationships in subject-specific finite element models of the proximal femur.
Cong A; Buijs JO; Dragomir-Daescu D
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 21030287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of the Johnson-Cook plasticity model in the finite element simulations of the nanoindentation of the cortical bone.
Remache D; Semaan M; Rossi JM; Pithioux M; Milan JL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jan; 101():103426. PubMed ID: 31557661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trabecular bone strength predictions using finite element analysis of micro-scale images at limited spatial resolution.
Bevill G; Keaveny TM
Bone; 2009 Apr; 44(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 19135184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trabecular plates and rods determine elastic modulus and yield strength of human trabecular bone.
Wang J; Zhou B; Liu XS; Fields AJ; Sanyal A; Shi X; Adams M; Keaveny TM; Guo XE
Bone; 2015 Mar; 72():71-80. PubMed ID: 25460571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent Young's modulus of human radius using inverse finite-element method.
Bosisio MR; Talmant M; Skalli W; Laugier P; Mitton D
J Biomech; 2007; 40(9):2022-8. PubMed ID: 17097663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of indentation of a sample equine bone using finite element simulation and single cycle reference point indentation.
Hoffseth K; Randall C; Hansma P; Yang HT
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():282-91. PubMed ID: 25528690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Formalin Preservation Time and Temperature on the Material Properties of Bovine Femoral Cortical Bone Tissue.
Zhang G; Wang S; Xu S; Guan F; Bai Z; Mao H
Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Apr; 47(4):937-952. PubMed ID: 30671755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of the failure criterion in micro-Finite Element models of the mouse tibia for the non-invasive prediction of its failure load in preclinical applications.
Oliviero S; Owen R; Reilly GC; Bellantuono I; Dall'Ara E
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jan; 113():104190. PubMed ID: 33191174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
