These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28528791)

  • 41. The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements.
    Taddei F; Schileo E; Helgason B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):973-9. PubMed ID: 17169598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Measuring the transverse Young's modulus of maize rind and pith tissues.
    Stubbs CJ; Sun W; Cook DD
    J Biomech; 2019 Feb; 84():113-120. PubMed ID: 30635117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Determination of a tissue-level failure evaluation standard for rat femoral cortical bone utilizing a hybrid computational-experimental method.
    Fan R; Liu J; Jia Z; Deng Y; Liu J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Jan; 232(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 29165039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship between trabecular bone structure modeling methods and the elastic modulus as calculated by FEM.
    Topoliński T; Cichański A; Mazurkiewicz A; Nowicki K
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():827196. PubMed ID: 22629210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.
    Yosibash Z; Padan R; Joskowicz L; Milgrom C
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 17536896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An experimentally validated micromechanical model of a rat vertebra under compressive loading.
    Tsafnat N; Wroe S
    J Anat; 2011 Jan; 218(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 20819113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations.
    Yosibash Z; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(16):3688-99. PubMed ID: 17706228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quantifying the Effects of Formalin Fixation on the Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone Using Beam Theory and Optimization Methodology With Specimen-Specific Finite Element Models.
    Zhang GJ; Yang J; Guan FJ; Chen D; Li N; Cao L; Mao H
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):. PubMed ID: 27447849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Modeling of Osteoprobe indentation on bone.
    Idkaidek A; Jasiuk I
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():365-373. PubMed ID: 30399565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Characterization of cancellous and cortical bone strain in the in vivo mouse tibial loading model using microCT-based finite element analysis.
    Yang H; Butz KD; Duffy D; Niebur GL; Nauman EA; Main RP
    Bone; 2014 Sep; 66():131-9. PubMed ID: 24925445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Finite element simulation of Reference Point Indentation on bone.
    Idkaidek A; Agarwal V; Jasiuk I
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():574-583. PubMed ID: 27721174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Valid micro finite element models of vertebral trabecular bone can be obtained using tissue properties measured with nanoindentation under wet conditions.
    Wolfram U; Wilke HJ; Zysset PK
    J Biomech; 2010 Jun; 43(9):1731-7. PubMed ID: 20206932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Using 3D finite element models verified the importance of callus material and microstructure in biomechanics restoration during bone defect repair.
    Li C; Tan R; Guo Y; Li S
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Jan; 21(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 29359598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analysis of anisotropic viscoelastoplastic properties of cortical bone tissues.
    Abdel-Wahab AA; Alam K; Silberschmidt VV
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jul; 4(5):807-20. PubMed ID: 21565728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
    Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Micro Finite Element models of the vertebral body: Validation of local displacement predictions.
    Costa MC; Tozzi G; Cristofolini L; Danesi V; Viceconti M; Dall'Ara E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180151. PubMed ID: 28700618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prediction of the mechanical response of the femur with uncertain elastic properties.
    Wille H; Rank E; Yosibash Z
    J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(7):1140-8. PubMed ID: 22417868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of density-modulus relationships used in finite element modeling of the shoulder.
    Knowles NK; Langohr GDG; Faieghi M; Nelson AJ; Ferreira LM
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Apr; 66():40-46. PubMed ID: 30833224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Elastic modulus varies along the bovine femur.
    Nobakhti S; Katsamenis OL; Zaarour N; Limbert G; Thurner PJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():279-285. PubMed ID: 28371701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The influence of boundary conditions and loading mode on high-resolution finite element-computed trabecular tissue properties.
    Bevill G; Eswaran SK; Farahmand F; Keaveny TM
    Bone; 2009 Apr; 44(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 19110082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.