206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28529251)
1. [Image Quality and Clinical Usefulness of Ray-summation Image Reconstructed from CT Data, Compared with Digital Radiography].
Suzuki S; Ichikawa K; Tamaki S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(5):372-381. PubMed ID: 28529251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
Ploussi A; Alexopoulou E; Economopoulos N; Argentos SI; Tsitsia V; Arapakis I; Kordolaimi S; Seimenis I; Efstathopoulos EP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 24107575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indirect computed tomography venography of the lower extremities using single-source dual-energy computed tomography: advantage of low-kiloelectron volt monochromatic images.
Kulkarni NM; Sahani DV; Desai GS; Kalva SP
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Jul; 23(7):879-86. PubMed ID: 22633619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preliminary results: prospective clinical study to assess image-based iterative reconstruction for abdominal computed tomography acquired at 2 radiation dose levels.
Pourjabbar S; Singh S; Singh AK; Johnston RP; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Do S; Padole A; Blake MA; Persson A; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 24424560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of image quality among different detector configurations using area detector computed tomography.
Miura Y; Ichikawa K; Fujimura I; Hara T; Hoshino T; Niwa S; Funahashi M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Mar; 11(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 29297139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model.
Larson DB; Wang LL; Podberesky DJ; Goske MJ
Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 23784878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT image quality in sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction phantom study - is there a point of diminishing returns?
Infante JC; Liu Y; Rigsby CK
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Mar; 47(3):333-341. PubMed ID: 27891546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Synthetic CT: simulating low dose single and dual energy protocols from a dual energy scan.
Wang AS; Pelc NJ
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5551-62. PubMed ID: 21992373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Virtual single-source computed tomography using dual-source acquisition: a new technique for the dose-neutral intraindividual comparison of different scan protocols.
Werncke T; Meyer BC; Wacker FK; von Falck C
Invest Radiol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):742-8. PubMed ID: 24918463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of a hybrid simulation technique for cone beam CT: application to an oral imaging system.
Zhang G; Pauwels R; Marshall N; Shaheen E; Nuyts J; Jacobs R; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(18):5823-43. PubMed ID: 21846936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of nonlinear three-dimensional optimized reconstruction algorithm filter on image quality and radiation dose: validation on phantoms.
Bai M; Chen J; Raupach R; Suess C; Tao Y; Peng M
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 19235377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
