These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28530416)

  • 1. Assessment centers versus cognitive ability tests: Challenging the conventional wisdom on criterion-related validity.
    Sackett PR; Shewach OR; Keiser HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1435-1447. PubMed ID: 28530416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between cognitive-ability saturation and subgroup mean differences across predictors of job performance.
    Dahlke JA; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1403-1420. PubMed ID: 28530415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
    Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who r u?: On the (in)accuracy of incumbent-based estimates of range restriction in criterion-related and differential validity research.
    Roth PL; Le H; Oh IS; Van Iddekinge CH; Robbins SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 May; 102(5):802-828. PubMed ID: 28150987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A contemporary look at the relationship between general cognitive ability and job performance.
    Sackett PR; Demeke S; Bazian IM; Griebie AM; Priest R; Kuncel NR
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 May; 109(5):687-713. PubMed ID: 38059952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection.
    Lievens F; Patterson F
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):927-40. PubMed ID: 21480685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance.
    McCarthy JM; Van Iddekinge CH; Lievens F; Kung MC; Sinar EF; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):701-19. PubMed ID: 23937298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenging conclusions about predictive bias against Hispanic test takers in personnel selection.
    Sackett PR; Zhang C; Berry CM
    J Appl Psychol; 2023 Feb; 108(2):341-349. PubMed ID: 34735177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Addressing criticisms of existing predictive bias research: cognitive ability test scores still overpredict African Americans' job performance.
    Berry CM; Zhao P
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Jan; 100(1):162-79. PubMed ID: 25150378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ability-performance relationships in education and employment settings: critical tests of the more-is-better and the good-enough hypotheses.
    Arneson JJ; Sackett PR; Beatty AS
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1336-42. PubMed ID: 21931155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A test of a proposed method for estimating validity of a multivariate composite predictor: extending the job component validity model.
    Hoffman CC; Morris D; Luck G
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):900-16. PubMed ID: 20099553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: implications for range restriction corrections in validation research.
    Sackett PR; Ostgaard DJ
    J Appl Psychol; 1994 Oct; 79(5):680-4. PubMed ID: 7989275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can I retake it? Exploring subgroup differences and criterion-related validity in promotion retesting.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Morgeson FP; Schleicher DJ; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 21517142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: a qualitative and quantitative review.
    Berry CM; Clark MA; McClure TK
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):881-906. PubMed ID: 21443313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A meta-analysis of the relationship between individual assessments and job performance.
    Morris SB; Daisley RL; Wheeler M; Boyer P
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Jan; 100(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 24865578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range.
    Sackett PR; Zhang C; Berry CM; Lievens F
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 Nov; 107(11):2040-2068. PubMed ID: 34968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More than g: selection quality and adverse impact implications of considering second-stratum cognitive abilities.
    Wee S; Newman DA; Joseph DL
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Jul; 99(4):547-63. PubMed ID: 24295534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of predictor weighting methods on incremental validity.
    Sackett PR; Dahlke JA; Shewach OR; Kuncel NR
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1421-1434. PubMed ID: 28530417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating cognitive ability, knowledge tests and situational judgement tests for postgraduate selection.
    Koczwara A; Patterson F; Zibarras L; Kerrin M; Irish B; Wilkinson M
    Med Educ; 2012 Apr; 46(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 22429176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Campbell JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 20919794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.