181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28531341)
1. Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis.
Koretsi V; Tingelhoff L; Proff P; Kirschneck C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28531341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.
Koretsi V; Kirschbauer C; Proff P; Kirschneck C
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3387-3396. PubMed ID: 30539294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological accuracy of digital and manual model analysis in orthodontics - A retrospective clinical study.
Lippold C; Kirschneck C; Schreiber K; Abukiress S; Tahvildari A; Moiseenko T; Danesh G
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Jul; 62():103-9. PubMed ID: 25917690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study.
Schirmer UR; Wiltshire WA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 9423701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-arch digital model vs. manual cast measurements: Accuracy and reliability.
Kiviahde H; Bukovac L; Jussila P; Pesonen P; Sipilä K; Raustia A; Pirttiniemi P
Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):222-227. PubMed ID: 28659050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a computed tomography scanning procedure to manufacture digital models.
Darroudi AM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Ongkosuwito EM; Suttorp CM; Bronkhorst EM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 28457278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity.
Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental measurements based on a three-dimensional digital technique: A comparative study on reliability and validity.
Liu J; Liu Y; Wang J; Zuo X; Wang X; Zhang Y; He H
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Apr; 124():105059. PubMed ID: 33508626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models.
Santoro M; Galkin S; Teredesai M; Nicolay OF; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul; 124(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 12867904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
Olszewski R; Szyper-Szczurowska J; Opach M; Bednarczyk P; Zapala J; Szczepanik S
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 31778603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
