These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28531341)

  • 21. Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software.
    Rafiei E; Haerian A; Fadaei Tehrani P; Shokrollahi M
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 8(5):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35719020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need.
    Mok CW; Zhou L; McGrath C; Hägg U; Bendeus M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Nov; 65(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 18071959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.
    Mayers M; Firestone AR; Rashid R; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 16214623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correlation and agreement of a digital and conventional method to measure arch parameters.
    Nawi N; Mohamed AM; Marizan Nor M; Ashar NA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 29116344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cécile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Junior HM; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
    Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 20739241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models.
    Goonewardene RW; Goonewardene MS; Razza JM; Murray K
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19113071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
    Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of intra-oral and study cast measurements in the assessment of malocclusion.
    Ovsenik M; Farcnik FM; Verdenik I
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15222711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size.
    Normando D; da Silva PL; Mendes ÁM
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
    Hildebrand JC; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Sivik M; Hans M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 18249296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of space analysis performed on plaster vs. digital dental casts applying Tanaka and Johnston's equation.
    Sanches JO; dos Santos-Pinto LA; dos Santos-Pinto A; Grehs B; Jeremias F
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 23876960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orthodontic study cast analysis--reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements.
    Sjögren AP; Lindgren JE; Huggare JA
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Aug; 23(4):482-92. PubMed ID: 19526268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Imprecision in orthodontic diagnosis: reliability of clinical measures of malocclusion.
    Keeling SD; McGorray S; Wheeler TT; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 8893108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts.
    Ko HC; Liu W; Hou D; Torkan S; Spiekerman C; Huang GJ
    Prog Orthod; 2018 Jul; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 30022327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Miasiro Junior H; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
    Braz Oral Res; 2009; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19893964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.