293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28531456)
1. Multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for estimation of fat-free mass in colorectal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.
Palle SS; Møllehave LT; Taheri-Kadkhoda Z; Johansen S; Larsen L; Hansen JW; Jensen NKG; Elingaard AO; Møller AH; Larsen K; Andersen JR
Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2016 Dec; 16():8-15. PubMed ID: 28531456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis in estimation of fat-free mass in colorectal cancer patients.
Ræder H; Kværner AS; Henriksen C; Florholmen G; Henriksen HB; Bøhn SK; Paur I; Smeland S; Blomhoff R
Clin Nutr; 2018 Feb; 37(1):292-300. PubMed ID: 28122662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin temperature and skin blood flow affect bioelectric impedance study of female fat-free mass.
Liang MT; Su HF; Lee NY
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Jan; 32(1):221-7. PubMed ID: 10647553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of quantitative magnetic resonance and eight-electrode bioelectrical impedance analysis in normal weight and obese women.
Bosaeus M; Karlsson T; Holmäng A; Ellegård L
Clin Nutr; 2014 Jun; 33(3):471-7. PubMed ID: 23871192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement of bioelectrical impedance with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and MRI to estimate changes in body fat, skeletal muscle and visceral fat during a 12-month weight loss intervention.
Pietiläinen KH; Kaye S; Karmi A; Suojanen L; Rissanen A; Virtanen KA
Br J Nutr; 2013 May; 109(10):1910-6. PubMed ID: 22935366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of bioelectrical impedance analysis to monitor changes in fat-free mass during recovery from colorectal cancer- a validation study.
Bärebring L; Kværner AS; Skotnes M; Henriksen HB; Skjetne AJ; Henriksen C; Ræder H; Paur I; Bøhn SK; Wiedswang G; Smeland S; Blomhoff R
Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2020 Dec; 40():201-207. PubMed ID: 33183537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indirect estimates of body composition are useful for groups but unreliable in individuals.
Piers LS; Soares MJ; Frandsen SL; O'Dea K
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2000 Sep; 24(9):1145-52. PubMed ID: 11033983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Body composition estimated by bioelectrical impedance in the Swedish elderly. Development of population-based prediction equation and reference values of fat-free mass and body fat for 70- and 75-y olds.
Dey DK; Bosaeus I; Lissner L; Steen B
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 12879085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bioelectrical impedance prediction equations for fat-free mass in a population-based sample of 75 y olds: the NORA study.
Dey DK; Bosaeus I
Nutrition; 2003 Oct; 19(10):858-64. PubMed ID: 14559321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating body composition in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and skinfold-thickness measurement.
Mok E; Béghin L; Gachon P; Daubrosse C; Fontan JE; Cuisset JM; Gottrand F; Hankard R
Am J Clin Nutr; 2006 Jan; 83(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 16400051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of fat free mass on prediction of densitometric body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by anthropometry.
Han TS; Carter R; Currall JE; Lean ME
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1996 Aug; 50(8):542-8. PubMed ID: 8863015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance measurement in males.
Cable A; Nieman DC; Austin M; Hogen E; Utter AC
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2001 Sep; 41(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 11533575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.
Thomson R; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
Clin Nutr; 2007 Dec; 26(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17936443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
King S; Wilson J; Kotsimbos T; Bailey M; Nyulasi I
Nutrition; 2005; 21(11-12):1087-94. PubMed ID: 16183254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in body composition during weight loss in obese subjects in the NUGENOB study: comparison of bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Verdich C; Barbe P; Petersen M; Grau K; Ward L; Macdonald I; Sørensen TI; Oppert JM
Diabetes Metab; 2011 Jun; 37(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 21236715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of fat mass and skeletal muscle mass estimation in male ultra-endurance athletes using bioelectrical impedance analysis and different anthropometric methods.
Knechtle B; Wirth A; Knechtle P; Rosemann T; Rüst CA; Bescós R
Nutr Hosp; 2011; 26(6):1420-7. PubMed ID: 22411391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis: a valuable tool for the measurement of body composition in children.
Tyrrell VJ; Richards G; Hofman P; Gillies GF; Robinson E; Cutfield WS
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Feb; 25(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 11410831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of hand-held bioelectrical impedance analysis with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of body composition in overweight women.
Varady KA; Santosa S; Jones PJ
Am J Hum Biol; 2007; 19(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 17421003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of four bioelectrical impedance analysis formulas in healthy elderly subjects.
Genton L; Karsegard VL; Kyle UG; Hans DB; Michel JP; Pichard C
Gerontology; 2001; 47(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11721145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of lean body mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a consideration of the pros and cons.
Sergi G; De Rui M; Stubbs B; Veronese N; Manzato E
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2017 Aug; 29(4):591-597. PubMed ID: 27568020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
