116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28532041)
1. Comparative analysis of stress in a new proposal of dental implants.
Valente MLDC; de Castro DT; Macedo AP; Shimano AC; Dos Reis AC
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Aug; 77():360-365. PubMed ID: 28532041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity.
Goiato MC; Shibayama R; Gennari Filho H; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; dos Santos DM; de Araújo CA
J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(2):35-42. PubMed ID: 26783652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is one dental mini-implant biomechanically appropriate for the retention of a mandibular overdenture? A comparison with Morse taper and external hexagon platforms.
Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Caldas RA; Pisani MX; Mesquita MF
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 32278498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysis.
Pellizzer EP; Lemos CAA; Almeida DAF; de Souza Batista VE; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Sep; 90():645-650. PubMed ID: 29853134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress distribution of different implant connections associated with multiple implant-supported prostheses.
Goiato MC; Sarauza Arsufi G; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; da Silva EVF; Sonego MV; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-367. PubMed ID: 30251571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the frameworks of implant-supported prostheses and implant connections on stress distribution.
Tonin BSH; Peixoto RF; Fu J; De Mattos MDGC; Macedo AP
Dent Med Probl; 2023; 60(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 38100082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress distribution of multiple implant-supported prostheses: Photoelastic and strain gauge analyses of external hexagon and morse taper connections.
Bittencourt AB; Rezende EO; Campaner M; Bitencourt SB; Dos Santos DM; Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC
J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e235-e240. PubMed ID: 35317292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Metal and Ceramic Abutments on the Stress Distribution Around Narrow Implants: A Photoelastic Stress Analysis.
Galvão GH; Grossi JA; Zielak JC; Giovanini AF; Furuse AY; Gonzaga CC
Implant Dent; 2016 Aug; 25(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 26963745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stress distribution on short implants with different designs: a photoelastic analysis.
Goiato MC; de Medeiros RA; Sônego MV; de Lima TM; Pesqueira AA; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27696920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Varying Diameter and Connection Type in Implants with High Crown-Implant Ratio.
Moraes SLD; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DAF; Lemos CAA; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 29267522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress distribution in bone simulation model with pre-angled implants.
Goiato MC; Arsufi GS; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; Guiotti AM; dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 26100976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
