BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28532203)

  • 1. Evaluation in undergraduate medical education: Conceptualizing and validating a novel questionnaire for assessing the quality of bedside teaching.
    Dreiling K; Montano D; Poinstingl H; Müller T; Schiekirka-Schwake S; Anders S; von Steinbüchel N; Raupach T
    Med Teach; 2017 Aug; 39(8):820-827. PubMed ID: 28532203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of large-group lectures in medicine - development of the SETMED-L (Student Evaluation of Teaching in MEDical Lectures) questionnaire.
    Müller T; Montano D; Poinstingl H; Dreiling K; Schiekirka-Schwake S; Anders S; Raupach T; von Steinbüchel N
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Aug; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 28821257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of psychometric properties of the modified SETQ tool in undergraduate medical education.
    Al Ansari A; Strachan K; Hashim S; Otoom S
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):56. PubMed ID: 28302151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the 25-Item Stanford Faculty Development Program Tool on Clinical Teaching Effectiveness.
    Mintz M; Southern DA; Ghali WA; Ma IW
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 25893939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Level of teaching competence at the Undergraduate Medical Internship of UNAM's Faculty of Medicine].
    Martínez-González A; Lifshitz-Guinzberg A; González-Quintanilla E; Monterrosas-Rojas AM; Flores-Hernández F; Gatica-Lara F; Martínez-Franco AI; Sánchez-Mendiola M
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2017; 55(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 29190872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.
    Sterz J; Höfer SH; Bender B; Janko M; Adili F; Ruesseler M
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):292. PubMed ID: 27842580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of the faculty evaluation instrument used at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences: Results from the Haematology Course.
    Al-Eidan F; Baig LA; Magzoub ME; Omair A
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Apr; 66(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 27122275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and psychometric characteristics of a new domain of the stanford faculty development program instrument.
    Owolabi MO
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2014; 34(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 24648360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers.
    Litzelman DK; Stratos GA; Marriott DJ; Skeff KM
    Acad Med; 1998 Jun; 73(6):688-95. PubMed ID: 9653408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of surgical faculty and surgical undergraduate teaching.
    Postuma R
    Can J Surg; 1985 Jul; 28(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 4016610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing Preceptor Use of Cognitive Apprenticeship: Is the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) a Useful Approach?
    Rodino AM; Wolcott MD
    Teach Learn Med; 2019; 31(5):506-518. PubMed ID: 31064222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What makes a good teacher? Lessons from teaching medical students.
    Markert RJ
    Acad Med; 2001 Aug; 76(8):809-10. PubMed ID: 11500281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the quality of teaching in medical education: are we using the evidence for both formative and summative purposes?
    Elzubeir M; Rizk D
    Med Teach; 2002 May; 24(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 12098420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving evaluation at two medical schools.
    Schiekirka-Schwake S; Dreiling K; Pyka K; Anders S; von Steinbüchel N; Raupach T
    Clin Teach; 2018 Aug; 15(4):314-318. PubMed ID: 28771992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) in Graduate Medical Training.
    Boerebach BC; Lombarts KM; Arah OA
    Eval Health Prof; 2016 Mar; 39(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 25280728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using the 360 degrees multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism.
    Berk RA
    Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1073-80. PubMed ID: 19995170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of "minimally invasive curricular surgery" - a pilot intervention study to improve the quality of bedside teaching in medical education.
    Raupach T; Anders S; Pukrop T; Hasenfuss G; Harendza S
    Med Teach; 2009 Sep; 31(9):e425-30. PubMed ID: 19811179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ["Practical clinical competence" - a joint programme to improve training in surgery].
    Ruesseler M; Schill A; Stibane T; Damanakis A; Schleicher I; Menzler S; Braunbeck A; Walcher F
    Zentralbl Chir; 2013 Dec; 138(6):663-8. PubMed ID: 23575519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role modelling in medical education: the importance of teaching skills.
    Burgess A; Oates K; Goulston K
    Clin Teach; 2016 Apr; 13(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 26119778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Redesign of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities in Anesthesiology Residency Training (SETQ Smart).
    Lombarts KM; Ferguson A; Hollmann MW; Malling B; ; Arah OA
    Anesthesiology; 2016 Nov; 125(5):1056-1065. PubMed ID: 27606931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.