These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28532210)

  • 1. The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.
    Boice JD
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 28532210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection.
    Shore RE; Beck HL; Boice JD; Caffrey EA; Davis S; Grogan HA; Mettler FA; Preston RJ; Till JE; Wakeford R; Walsh L; Dauer LT
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Sep; 38(3):1217-1233. PubMed ID: 30004025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
    Doss M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NCRP Vision for the Future and Program Area Committee Activities.
    Boice JD
    Health Phys; 2017 Feb; 112(2):225-229. PubMed ID: 28027166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection.
    Laurier D; Billarand Y; Klokov D; Leuraud K
    J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jun; 43(2):. PubMed ID: 37339605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose reconstruction for the million worker study: status and guidelines.
    Bouville A; Toohey RE; Boice JD; Beck HL; Dauer LT; Eckerman KF; Hagemeyer D; Leggett RW; Mumma MT; Napier B; Pryor KH; Rosenstein M; Schauer DA; Sherbini S; Stram DO; Thompson JL; Till JE; Yoder C; Zeitlin C
    Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(2):206-20. PubMed ID: 25551504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Preston RJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18849687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Tremendous Human, Social, and Economic Losses Caused by Obstinate Application of the Failed Linear No-threshold Model].
    Sutou S
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2015; 135(11):1197-211. PubMed ID: 26521869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent Epidemiologic Studies and the Linear No-Threshold Model For Radiation Protection-Considerations Regarding NCRP Commentary 27.
    Shore RE; Beck HL; Boice JD; Caffrey EA; Davis S; Grogan HA; Mettler FA; Preston RJ; Till JE; Wakeford R; Walsh L; Dauer LT
    Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):235-246. PubMed ID: 30585971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation protection principles of NCRP.
    Kase KR
    Health Phys; 2004 Sep; 87(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15303061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NCRP Vision for the Future and Program Area Committee Activities in 2017.
    Boice JD
    Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):232-242. PubMed ID: 30086021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NCRP Vision for the Future and Program Area Committee Activities in 2018.
    Boice JD
    Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):282-294. PubMed ID: 30585977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A critical evaluation of the NCRP COMMENTARY 27 endorsement of the linear no-threshold model of radiation effects.
    Ulsh BA
    Environ Res; 2018 Nov; 167():472-487. PubMed ID: 30138826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Million Person Study, whence it came and why.
    Boice JD; Cohen SS; Mumma MT; Ellis ED
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2022; 98(4):537-550. PubMed ID: 30831042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comments on the DDREF estimate of the BEIR VII Committee.
    Hoel DG
    Health Phys; 2015 Mar; 108(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 25627947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of low-dose radiation and the BEIR VII report: A critical review of what it does and doesn't say.
    O'Connor MK
    Phys Med; 2017 Nov; 43():153-158. PubMed ID: 28826776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The state of the art in the 1990's: NCRP Report No. 136 on the scientific bases for linearity in the dose-response relationship for ionizing radiation.
    Upton AC;
    Health Phys; 2003 Jul; 85(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 12852466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
    Charles MW
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.