300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28533015)
1. In vitro comparison of the load-bearing capacity of ceramic and metal-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses in the posterior region.
Bömicke W; Waldecker M; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Rues S
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 28533015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture Behavior of Minimally Invasive, Posterior, and Fixed Dental Prostheses Manufactured from Monolithic Zirconia.
Bömicke W; Rues S; Hlavacek V; Rammelsberg P; Schmitter M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 Nov; 28(6):367-381. PubMed ID: 27562053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial damage and failure load of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Bömicke W; Boisserée P; Rammelsberg P; Rues S
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jan; 28(1):94. PubMed ID: 38221600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Load bearing capacity and Weibull characteristics of inlay-retained resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis made of all-ceramic, fiber-reinforced composite and metal-ceramic after cyclic loading.
Brunner KC; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Sep; 109():103855. PubMed ID: 32543415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Thermomechanical and Static Loading on the Load to Fracture of Metal-Ceramic, Monolithic, and Veneered Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
Lopez-Suarez C; Tobar C; Sola-Ruiz MF; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 30548895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro fracture resistance of posterior metal-ceramic and all-ceramic inlay-retained resin-bonded fixed partial dentures.
Kiliçarslan MA; Kedici PS; Küçükeşmen HC; Uludağ BC
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 15507910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of zirconia cantilevered single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses replacing missing canines and posterior teeth.
Yazigi C; Kern M
J Dent; 2022 Jan; 116():103907. PubMed ID: 34838845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors.
Kern M; Passia N; Sasse M; Yazigi C
J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():51-55. PubMed ID: 28688950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.
Puschmann D; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 19583761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival of anterior cantilevered all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses made from zirconia ceramic.
Sasse M; Kern M
J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):660-3. PubMed ID: 24613605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inlay-retained cantilever fixed dental prostheses to substitute a single premolar: impact of zirconia framework design after dynamic loading.
Shahin R; Tannous F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Aug; 122(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 24910293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical performance of anterior resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with different framework designs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wei YR; Wang XD; Zhang Q; Li XX; Blatz MB; Jian YT; Zhao K
J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():1-7. PubMed ID: 26875611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design.
Boemicke W; Kappel S; Stober T; Rammelsberg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24912399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive prosthetic restoration of posterior tooth loss with resin-bonded, wing-retained, and inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses fabricated from monolithic zirconia: A clinical report of two patients.
Bömicke W; Karl J; Rammelsberg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):459-462. PubMed ID: 27881326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retention of posterior resin bonded fixed dental prostheses with different designs after chewing simulation.
Tagami A; Chaar MS; Wille S; Tagami J; Kern M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Nov; 123():104758. PubMed ID: 34385066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture strength of lithium disilicate cantilever resin bonded fixed dental prosthesis.
Gresnigt MMM; Tirlet G; Bošnjak M; van der Made S; Attal JP
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103615. PubMed ID: 32090939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective clinical study of single-retainer cantilever anterior and posterior glass-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses at a mean follow-up of 6 years.
Sailer I; Bonani T; Brodbeck U; Hämmerle CH
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 23998142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-retainer all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses: Long-term outcomes in the esthetic zone.
Kern M; Gläser R
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 36579757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
