These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 285336)

  • 1. GMAG states the position on 'self-closing'.
    Nature; 1979 Apr; 278(5704):496. PubMed ID: 285336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic manipulation advisory group (GMAG) and the environment for genetic engineering in Britain.
    Williamson R
    Biochem Soc Symp; 1979; 44():119-21. PubMed ID: 291433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic manipulation: new guidelines for UK.
    Nature; 1978 Nov; 276(5684):104-8. PubMed ID: 283310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plenty for GMAG to do.
    Nature; 1978 Nov; 276(5683):1. PubMed ID: 283308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Senate hearing on the potential environmental consequences of genetic engineering.
    Milweski E
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1984 Dec; 7(4):189-203. PubMed ID: 6598875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The modern management and therapy of pulmonary tuberculosis.
    Oswald NC
    Proc R Soc Med; 1977 Apr; 70(4):291-2. PubMed ID: 866341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Pink Sheet Syndrome.
    Fuller EO
    Nurs Res; 1982; 31(3):185-6. PubMed ID: 6918927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Role of government and public organizations in conducting oncological research in Great Britain].
    Kiselev AK
    Vopr Onkol; 1978; 24(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 581013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic regulations: US to settle dispute over agency jurisdiction.
    Palca J
    Nature; 1986 May 29-Jun 4; 321(6069):458. PubMed ID: 3459021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research needs for biotic environmental effects of genetically-engineered microorganisms.
    Rissler JF
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1984 Mar; 7(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 6587444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biotechnology of age.
    Nature; 1991 Feb; 349(6312):726. PubMed ID: 2000139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of USDA quarantine regulations and culture collections in recombinant DNA research.
    Tolin SA
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1981 Dec; 4(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 6946529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benveniste under review.
    Coles P
    Nature; 1989 Jul; 340(6229):89. PubMed ID: 2739750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic engineering. USDA goes too public too quickly.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1986 Apr 10-16; 320(6062):473. PubMed ID: 3457269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaginary hazards?
    Miller HI; Huttner SL
    Nature; 1991 Sep; 353(6341):204. PubMed ID: 1896066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of gene patenting on R&D and commerce.
    Stott M; Valentine J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):729-31; author reply 731. PubMed ID: 12833081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review of environmental risk assessment studies sponsored by EPA.
    Levin M
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1982 Dec; 5(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 6962468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unauthorized release upsets EPA.
    Ezzell C
    Nature; 1987 Aug 20-26; 328(6132):659. PubMed ID: 3475580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women in medical engineering?
    Biomed Eng; 1969 Jul; 4(7):307. PubMed ID: 5802464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.