These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28534729)

  • 1. Self-Selection of Frequency Tables with Bilateral Mismatches in an Acoustic Simulation of a Cochlear Implant.
    Fitzgerald MB; Prosolovich K; Tan CT; Glassman EK; Svirsky MA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):385-394. PubMed ID: 28534729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.
    Fitzgerald MB; Sagi E; Morbiwala TA; Tan CT; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 23807089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
    Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
    Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of reducing the number of electrodes on spatial hearing tasks for bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    Perreau A; Tyler RS; Witt SA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 20166312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of tonotopic matching and spatial cues on segregation of competing speech in simulations of bilateral cochlear implants.
    Thomas M; Willis S; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270759. PubMed ID: 35788202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
    Sheffield SW; Jahn K; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Battmer RD; Beckschebe J; Lenarz T
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 16079633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
    van Besouw RM; Forrester L; Crowe ND; Rowan D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.
    Dunn CC; Perreau A; Gantz B; Tyler RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 20085199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.