BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28535177)

  • 1. Invited Commentary: Selection Bias Without Colliders.
    Hernán MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 185(11):1048-1050. PubMed ID: 28535177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias.
    Lu H; Gonsalves GS; Westreich D
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(3):407-409. PubMed ID: 37939152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Interrogating Bias: Reflections on Hernán et al. 20 Years Later.
    Levy NS; Keyes KM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 192(11):1797-1800. PubMed ID: 34791035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider.
    Cole SR; Platt RW; Schisterman EF; Chu H; Westreich D; Richardson D; Poole C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 39(2):417-20. PubMed ID: 19926667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
    Liu W; Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S; Mi X; Setoguchi S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 176(10):938-48. PubMed ID: 23100247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Educational Note: Paradoxical collider effect in the analysis of non-communicable disease epidemiological data: a reproducible illustration and web application.
    Luque-Fernandez MA; Schomaker M; Redondo-Sanchez D; Jose Sanchez Perez M; Vaidya A; Schnitzer ME
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):640-653. PubMed ID: 30561628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invited Commentary: Beware the Test-Negative Design.
    Westreich D; Hudgens MG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 184(5):354-6. PubMed ID: 27587722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A structural approach to selection bias.
    Hernán MA; Hernández-Díaz S; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2004 Sep; 15(5):615-25. PubMed ID: 15308962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Invited Commentary: Causal diagrams and measurement bias.
    Hernán MA; Cole SR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 170(8):959-62; discussion 963-4. PubMed ID: 19755635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward a Clearer Definition of Selection Bias When Estimating Causal Effects.
    Lu H; Cole SR; Howe CJ; Westreich D
    Epidemiology; 2022 Sep; 33(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 35700187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instrumental Variable Analyses and Selection Bias.
    Canan C; Lesko C; Lau B
    Epidemiology; 2017 May; 28(3):396-398. PubMed ID: 28169934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring Selection Bias by Causal Frailty Models: The Magnitude Matters.
    Stensrud MJ; Valberg M; Røysland K; Aalen OO
    Epidemiology; 2017 May; 28(3):379-386. PubMed ID: 28244888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Invited commentary: composite outcomes as an attempt to escape from selection bias and related paradoxes.
    Hernán MA; Schisterman EF; Hernández-Díaz S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 179(3):368-70. PubMed ID: 24287470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection Bias with Outcome-dependent Sampling.
    Sjölander A
    Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):186-191. PubMed ID: 36722800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limits for the Magnitude of M-bias and Certain Other Types of Structural Selection Bias.
    Flanders WD; Ye D
    Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 31033689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Invited commentary: G-computation--lost in translation?
    Vansteelandt S; Keiding N
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):739-42. PubMed ID: 21415028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invited commentary: Agent-based models for causal inference—reweighting data and theory in epidemiology.
    Hernán MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 181(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 25480820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing and addressing collider bias in addiction research: the curious case of smoking and COVID-19.
    Tattan-Birch H; Marsden J; West R; Gage SH
    Addiction; 2021 May; 116(5):982-984. PubMed ID: 33226690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results on differential and dependent measurement error of the exposure and the outcome using signed directed acyclic graphs.
    VanderWeele TJ; Hernán MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 175(12):1303-10. PubMed ID: 22569106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection bias due to parity-conditioning in studies of time trends in fertility.
    Sallmén M; Bonde JP; Lindbohm ML; Kristensen P
    Epidemiology; 2015 Jan; 26(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 25350769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.