282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28535496)
1. The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.
Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Tosteson ANA; Carney PA; Geller BM; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Oster NV; Pepe MS; Elmore JG
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():39-47. PubMed ID: 28535496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Allison KH; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Weaver DL
JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 25781441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective.
Elmore JG; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Tosteson AN; Geller B; Onega T; Carney PA; Jackson SL; Allison KH; Weaver DL
Ann Intern Med; 2016 May; 164(10):649-55. PubMed ID: 26999810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Machine Learning of Breast Pathology Structures for Automated Differentiation of Breast Cancer and High-Risk Proliferative Lesions.
Mercan E; Mehta S; Bartlett J; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198777. PubMed ID: 31397859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying and processing the gap between perceived and actual agreement in breast pathology interpretation.
Carney PA; Allison KH; Oster NV; Frederick PD; Morgan TR; Geller BM; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):717-26. PubMed ID: 27056072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time?
Jackson SL; Frederick PD; Pepe MS; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Allison KH; Carney PA; Geller BM; Tosteson AN; Onega T; Elmore JG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241. PubMed ID: 27913946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Alghamdi SA; Krishnamurthy K; Garces Narvaez SA; Algashaamy KJ; Aoun J; Reis IM; Recine MA; Jorda M; Poppiti RJ; Gomez-Fernandez CR
Am J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 153(3):360-367. PubMed ID: 31769792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-observer variability between general pathologists and a specialist in breast pathology in the diagnosis of lobular neoplasia, columnar cell lesions, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Gomes DS; Porto SS; Balabram D; Gobbi H
Diagn Pathol; 2014 Jun; 9():121. PubMed ID: 24948027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognizing breast ductal carcinoma in situ on fine-needle aspiration: a diagnostic dilemma.
Guo HQ; Zhang ZH; Zhao H; Zhao LL; Pan QJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 41(8):710-5. PubMed ID: 23729369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathologists' agreement with experts and reproducibility of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ classification schemes.
Wells WA; Carney PA; Eliassen MS; Grove MR; Tosteson AN
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 May; 24(5):651-9. PubMed ID: 10800983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Influence of Disease Severity of Preceding Clinical Cases on Pathologists' Medical Decision Making.
Frederick PD; Nelson HD; Carney PA; Brunyé TT; Allison KH; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Med Decis Making; 2017 Jan; 37(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 27037007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ among an international group of pathologists.
van Seijen M; Jóźwiak K; Pinder SE; Hall A; Krishnamurthy S; Thomas JS; Collins LC; Bijron J; Bart J; Cohen D; Ng W; Bouybayoune I; Stobart H; Hudecek J; Schaapveld M; Thompson A; Lips EH; Wesseling J;
J Pathol Clin Res; 2021 May; 7(3):233-242. PubMed ID: 33620141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Bordering on Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Tozbikian G; Brogi E; Vallejo CE; Giri D; Murray M; Catalano J; Olcese C; Van Zee KJ; Wen HY
Int J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 25(2):100-107. PubMed ID: 27481892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atypia in breast pathology: what pathologists need to know.
Katayama A; Toss MS; Parkin M; Ellis IO; Quinn C; Rakha EA
Pathology; 2022 Feb; 54(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 34872753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep-learning model to improve histological grading and predict upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia / ductal carcinoma in situ on breast biopsy.
Huang CY; Chang RF; Lin CY; Hsieh MS; Liao PC; Wang YJ; Kao YC; Porta L; Lin PY; Lee CC; Lee YH
Histopathology; 2024 May; 84(6):983-1002. PubMed ID: 38288642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational pathology to discriminate benign from malignant intraductal proliferations of the breast.
Dong F; Irshad H; Oh EY; Lerwill MF; Brachtel EF; Jones NC; Knoblauch NW; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Johnson NB; Rao LK; Faulkner-Jones B; Wilbur DC; Schnitt SJ; Beck AH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114885. PubMed ID: 25490766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a nationwide study of 4901 patients in the Netherlands.
van Dooijeweert C; van Diest PJ; Willems SM; Kuijpers CCHJ; Overbeek LIH; Deckers IAG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(2):479-488. PubMed ID: 30539380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
Wei B; Bu H; Zhu CR; Guo LX; Chen HJ; Zhao C; Zhang P; Chen DY; Tang Y; Jiang Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grade of ductal carcinoma in situ accompanying infiltrating ductal carcinoma as an independent prognostic factor.
Kim JY; Han W; Moon HG; Park IA; Ahn SK; Kim J; Lee JW; Kim T; Kim MK; Noh DY
Clin Breast Cancer; 2013 Oct; 13(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 23870857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
