190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28535498)
1. Can DMCO Detect Visual Field Loss in Neurological Patients? A Secondary Validation Study.
Olsen AS; Steensberg AT; la Cour M; Kjaer TW; Damato B; Pinborg LH; Kolko M
Ophthalmic Res; 2017; 58(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 28535498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of visual field defects by opticians - with Damato Multifixation Campimetry Online.
Olsen AS; la Cour M; Damato B; Kolko M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 97(6):577-582. PubMed ID: 30593721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glaucoma detection with damato multifixation campimetry online.
Olsen AS; Alberti M; Serup L; la Cour M; Damato B; Kolko M
Eye (Lond); 2016 May; 30(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 26987590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2C Test Grids for Identifying Central Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Suspect Patients.
Phu J; Kalloniatis M
Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1405-1416. PubMed ID: 33722636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.
Ianchulev T; Pham P; Makarov V; Francis B; Minckler D
Curr Eye Res; 2005 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15875358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cases of advanced visual field loss at referral to glaucoma clinics - more men than women?
Crabb DP; Saunders LJ; Edwards LA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 27862125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Clues to Predict the Presence of Parafoveal Scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 Visual Field Using a Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field.
Park HY; Hwang BE; Shin HY; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():150-9. PubMed ID: 26476213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual field defects after temporal lobe resection for epilepsy.
Steensberg AT; Olsen AS; Litman M; Jespersen B; Kolko M; Pinborg LH
Seizure; 2018 Jan; 54():1-6. PubMed ID: 29172092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of an iPad Application to Detect Moderate and Advanced Visual Field Loss in Nepal.
Johnson CA; Thapa S; George Kong YX; Robin AL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():147-154. PubMed ID: 28844641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of Fast Visual Field Loss With Risk of Falling in Patients With Glaucoma.
Baig S; Diniz-Filho A; Wu Z; Abe RY; Gracitelli CP; Cabezas E; Medeiros FA
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 134(8):880-6. PubMed ID: 27280703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The repeatability of mean defect with size III and size V standard automated perimetry.
Wall M; Doyle CK; Zamba KD; Artes P; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1345-51. PubMed ID: 23341012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Damato campimetry and Humphrey automated perimetry results in a clinical population.
Rowe FJ; Sueke H; Gawley SD
Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 94(6):757-62. PubMed ID: 20447958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detectability of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma With High-resolution Perimetry.
Numata T; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Tanabe F; Hashimoto S; Nomoto H; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2016 Oct; 25(10):847-853. PubMed ID: 27367134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors.
Singh MD; Jain K
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.
Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shimizu K
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25563. PubMed ID: 27149561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early detection of glaucoma by means of a novel 3D computer-automated visual field test.
Nazemi PP; Fink W; Sadun AA; Francis B; Minckler D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1331-6. PubMed ID: 17504855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevent Blindness America visual field screening study. The Prevent Blindness America Glaucoma Advisory Committee.
Sponsel WE; Ritch R; Stamper R; Higginbotham EJ; Anderson DR; Wilson MR; Zimmerman TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Dec; 120(6):699-708. PubMed ID: 8540543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
