145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28535887)
1. Primary endpoint discrepancies were found in one in ten clinical drug trials. Results of an inception cohort study.
van den Bogert CA; Souverein PC; Brekelmans CTM; Janssen SWJ; Koëter GH; Leufkens HGM; Bouter LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():199-208. PubMed ID: 28535887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():87-94. PubMed ID: 28757260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort study.
van den Bogert CA; Souverein PC; Brekelmans CT; Janssen SW; van Hunnik M; Koëter GH; Leufkens HG; Bouter LM
BMJ Open; 2015 Jul; 5(7):e007827. PubMed ID: 26152325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.
Killeen S; Sourallous P; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Grady HL
Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 23732270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning.
Dal-Ré R; Marušić A
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 72(10):1283-1288. PubMed ID: 27484242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-Publication Is Common among Phase 1, Single-Center, Not Prospectively Registered, or Early Terminated Clinical Drug Trials.
van den Bogert CA; Souverein PC; Brekelmans CT; Janssen SW; Koëter GH; Leufkens HG; Bouter LM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167709. PubMed ID: 27973571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish.
Rosati P; Porzsolt F; Ricciotti G; Testa G; Inglese R; Giustini F; Fiscarelli E; Zazza M; Carlino C; Balassone V; Fiorito R; D'Amico R
Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):430. PubMed ID: 27659549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles.
Pranić S; Marušić A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():26-37. PubMed ID: 26226103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study.
Zou CX; Becker JE; Phillips AT; Garritano JM; Krumholz HM; Miller JE; Ross JS
Trials; 2018 Oct; 19(1):581. PubMed ID: 30352601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials.
Vassar M; Roberts W; Cooper CM; Wayant C; Bibens M
Addiction; 2020 Jun; 115(6):1172-1179. PubMed ID: 31743532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancies between registered and published primary outcome specifications in analgesic trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations.
Smith SM; Wang AT; Pereira A; Chang DR; McKeown A; Greene K; Rowbotham MC; Burke LB; Coplan P; Gilron I; Hertz SH; Katz NP; Lin AH; McDermott MP; Papadopoulos EJ; Rappaport BA; Sweeney M; Turk DC; Dworkin RH
Pain; 2013 Dec; 154(12):2769-2774. PubMed ID: 23962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Non-publication is common among phase 1, single-center, not prospectively registered, or early terminated clinical drug trials].
van den Bogert CA; Souverein PC; Brekelmans CTM; Janssen SWJ; Koëter GH; Leufkens HGM; Bouter LM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2017; 161():D1498. PubMed ID: 28659210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discrepancies in endpoints between clinical trial protocols and clinical trial registration in randomized trials in oncology.
Serpas VJ; Raghav KP; Halperin DM; Yao J; Overman MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):169. PubMed ID: 30541475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(20):2457-65. PubMed ID: 15161896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials.
Dwan K; Altman DG; Clarke M; Gamble C; Higgins JP; Sterne JA; Williamson PR; Kirkham JJ
PLoS Med; 2014 Jun; 11(6):e1001666. PubMed ID: 24959719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Publication and non-publication of drug trial results: a 10-year cohort of trials in Norwegian general practice.
Brænd AM; Straand J; Jakobsen RB; Klovning A
BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010535. PubMed ID: 27067893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective outcome reporting in obesity clinical trials: a cross-sectional review.
Rankin J; Ross A; Baker J; O'Brien M; Scheckel C; Vassar M
Clin Obes; 2017 Aug; 7(4):245-254. PubMed ID: 28557240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials.
Krsticevic M; Saric D; Saric F; Slapnicar E; Boric K; Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Kegalj MJ; Puljak L
J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Nov; 8(15):1265-1273. PubMed ID: 31739691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.
Wayant C; Scheckel C; Hicks C; Nissen T; Leduc L; Som M; Vassar M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178379. PubMed ID: 28570573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
