These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28535955)

  • 1. Fracture resistance of molar teeth with mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) restorations.
    Chai H; Lawn BR
    Dent Mater; 2017 Jul; 33(7):e283-e289. PubMed ID: 28535955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the fracture behavior of molar teeth with MOD cavity preparation.
    Chai H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Apr; 140():105747. PubMed ID: 36870162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Adhesively Restored Molar Teeth with Different MOD Cavity Dimensions.
    Forster A; Braunitzer G; Tóth M; Szabó BP; Fráter M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e325-e331. PubMed ID: 29508474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
    Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro fracture resistance of molar teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composite material.
    Fráter M; Forster A; Keresztúri M; Braunitzer G; Nagy K
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 24859462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
    Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Resistance of cavity walls of composite filled teeth].
    Fabianelli A; De Luca S; Garberoglio R
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 Sep; 59(13):94-100, 103-4. PubMed ID: 1824368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture strength of root filled premolar teeth restored with silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Bagheri R; Abu Holy A
    J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 25656772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
    Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of several fibre-reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth.
    Akman S; Akman M; Eskitascioglu G; Belli S
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 21219366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
    Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.