These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28535955)

  • 21. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Novel non-invasive reinforcement of MOD cavities on endodontically treated teeth.
    Daher R; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():77-85. PubMed ID: 27664468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Effects of Endodontic Access Cavity Preparation Design on the Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Traditional Versus Conservative Preparation.
    Özyürek T; Ülker Ö; Demiryürek EÖ; Yılmaz F
    J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):800-805. PubMed ID: 29571907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PCF; Queiroz EC; Araújo TC; Campos RE; Araújo CA; Soares CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 17971112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Resistance recovery of prepared teeth obturated with different materials].
    Pérez Gutiérrez I; Navajas Rodríguez de Mondelo JM
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1989 Dec; 5(10):686-90. PubMed ID: 2640099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
    Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
    Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
    Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of Different Restoration Techniques on Fracture Resistance of Root-filled Teeth: In Vitro Investigation.
    Hshad ME; Dalkılıç EE; Ozturk GC; Dogruer I; Koray F
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 29148912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effects of Cavity Preparation and Composite Resin on Bond Strength and Stress Distribution Using the Microtensile Bond Test.
    Braga S; Oliveira L; Rodrigues RB; Bicalho AA; Novais VR; Armstrong S; Soares CJ
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 28976839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restorations: influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage.
    Coelho-De-Souza FH; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 18335731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration.
    Liu X; Fok A; Li H
    Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24424091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A temporary filling material used for coronal sealing during endodontic treatment may cause tooth fractures in large Class II cavities in vitro.
    Tennert C; Eismann M; Goetz F; Woelber JP; Hellwig E; Polydorou O
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 24646310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of ceramic inlays and composite fillings on fracture resistance of premolars in vitro.
    Ragauska A; Apse P; Kasjanovs V; Berzina-Cimdina L
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):121-6. PubMed ID: 19223711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.