381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28537011)
1. Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory.
Rajsic J; Ouslis NE; Wilson DE; Pratt J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 28537011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
Kerzel D; Witzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016).
Frătescu M; Van Moorselaar D; Mathôt S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 31309532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinct prioritization of visual working memory representations for search and for recall.
Dube B; Al-Aidroos N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 30644056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior α EEG Dynamics Dissociate Current from Future Goals in Working Memory-Guided Visual Search.
de Vries IE; van Driel J; Olivers CN
J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(6):1591-1603. PubMed ID: 28069918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
Hollingworth A; Beck VM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The aftermath of memory retrieval for recycling visual working memory representations.
Park HB; Zhang W; Hyun JS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1393-1407. PubMed ID: 28378282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Working memory is corrupted by strategic changes in search templates.
Kong G; Meehan J; Fougnie D
J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):3. PubMed ID: 32744619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
Foerster RM; Schneider WX
Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
Bahle B; Beck VM; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):992-1011. PubMed ID: 29629781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?
Rajsic J; Woodman GF
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):269-279. PubMed ID: 30937674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Searching while loaded: Visual working memory does not interfere with hybrid search efficiency but hybrid search uses working memory capacity.
Drew T; Boettcher SE; Wolfe JM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):201-12. PubMed ID: 26055755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.
Bahle B; Thayer DD; Mordkoff JT; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 May; 149(5):967-983. PubMed ID: 31589068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Similarity-based clusters are representational units of visual working memory.
Son G; Oh BI; Kang MS; Chong SC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 31070398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motivation and short-term memory in visual search: Attention's accelerator revisited.
Schneider D; Bonmassar C; Hickey C
Cortex; 2018 May; 102():45-56. PubMed ID: 28757149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
