These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2853711)

  • 1. The effect of glass-ceramic bone implant materials on the in vitro formation of hydroxyapatite.
    Blumenthal NC; Posner AS; Cosma V; Gross U
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Nov; 22(11):1033-41. PubMed ID: 2853711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interface of calcium-phosphate and glass-ceramic in bone, a structural analysis.
    Gross UM; Müller-Mai CM; Voigt C
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jul; 11():83-5. PubMed ID: 2397266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new glass-ceramic for bone replacement: evaluation of its bonding to bone tissue.
    Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Higashi S; Kokubo T; Itoo S
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985; 19(6):685-98. PubMed ID: 3001094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interface mechanics and histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated and porous glass-ceramic implants in canine bone.
    Nimb L; Jensen JS; Gotfredsen K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Dec; 29(12):1477-82. PubMed ID: 8600137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Bando Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Nov; 26(11):1419-32. PubMed ID: 1447227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interface reactions between machinable bioactive glass-ceramics and bone.
    Höland W; Vogel W; Naumann K; Gummel J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Mar; 19(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 4077884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strengthening of bone-implant interface by the use of granule coatings on alumina ceramics.
    Kakutani Y; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kotoura Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Jul; 23(7):781-808. PubMed ID: 2738088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in ceramic-bone interface between surface-active ceramics and resorbable ceramics: a study by scanning and transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Fujita Y; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Bando Y; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Feb; 26(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 1569117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite ceramic: a study of retrieved human middle ear implants.
    van Blitterswijk CA; Hesseling SC; Grote JJ; Koerten HK; de Groot K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Apr; 24(4):433-53. PubMed ID: 2161412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The interface between hydroxyapatite ceramic and newly formed bone in scanning electron microscopy].
    Brill W; Katthagen BD
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1987; 125(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 3039750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apatite formation on three kinds of bioactive material at an early stage in vivo: a comparative study by transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Nakamura T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Yamamuro T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Aug; 27(8):999-1006. PubMed ID: 8408128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms and structure of the bond between bone and hydroxyapatite ceramics.
    Bagambisa FB; Joos U; Schilli W
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Aug; 27(8):1047-55. PubMed ID: 8408117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tensile strength of the interface between hydroxyapatite and bone.
    Hong L; Xu HC; de Groot K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Jan; 26(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 1315777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biocompatibility of zirconia dispersed hydroxyapatite ceramics.
    Suzuki O; Suda A; Sato T; Takagi M; Osanai T
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Apr; 64(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 2166117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Osteogenic activity of bone morphogenetic protein and hydroxyapatite composite implants.
    Herr G; Wahl D; Küsswetter W
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1993; 207():99-107. PubMed ID: 8154844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone-bonding behavior under load-bearing conditions of an alumina ceramic implant incorporating beads coated with glass-ceramic containing apatite and wollastonite.
    Li ZL; Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Chang YS; Senaha Y; Takagi H; Nakamura T; Oka M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Sep; 29(9):1081-8. PubMed ID: 8567706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preparation of dense hydroxylapatite or rhenanite containing bioactive glass composites.
    Kangasniemi IM; de Groot K; Becht JG; Yli-Urpo A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 May; 26(5):663-74. PubMed ID: 1324942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of hydroxyapatite impregnation on skeletal bonding of porous coated implants.
    Ducheyne P; Hench LL; Kagan A; Martens M; Bursens A; Mulier JC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 May; 14(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 7364787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle.
    Hench LL; Paschall HA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1973; 7(3):25-42. PubMed ID: 4123968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Production and characterization of a glass-ceramic biomaterial and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of its biological effects].
    Ceyhan T; Günay V; Capoğlu A; Sayrak H; Karaca C
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 18180562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.