These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28537237)

  • 1. [Comparative results of preimplantation genetic screening by array comparative genomic hybridization and new-generation sequencing].
    Aleksandrova NV; Shubina ES; Ekimov AN; Kodyleva TA; Mukosey IS; Makarova NP; Kulakova EV; Levkov LA; Barkov IY; Trofimov DY; Sukhikh GT
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2017; 51(2):308-313. PubMed ID: 28537237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized comparison of next-generation sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization for preimplantation genetic screening: a pilot study.
    Yang Z; Lin J; Zhang J; Fong WI; Li P; Zhao R; Liu X; Podevin W; Kuang Y; Liu J
    BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Jun; 8():30. PubMed ID: 26100406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles.
    Friedenthal J; Maxwell SM; Munné S; Kramer Y; McCulloh DH; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Apr; 109(4):627-632. PubMed ID: 29605407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the results of preimplantation genetic screening obtained by a-CGH and NGS methods from the same embryos.
    Aleksandrova N; Shubina E; Ekimov A; Kodyleva T; Mukosey I; Makarova N; Kulakova E; Levkov L; Trofimov D; Sukhikh G
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2016 Oct; 32(sup2):1-4. PubMed ID: 27759447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing.
    Vera-Rodríguez M; Michel CE; Mercader A; Bladon AJ; Rodrigo L; Kokocinski F; Mateu E; Al-Asmar N; Blesa D; Simón C; Rubio C
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Apr; 105(4):1047-1055.e2. PubMed ID: 26776911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development.
    Capalbo A; Bono S; Spizzichino L; Biricik A; Baldi M; Colamaria S; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Fiorentino F
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):509-18. PubMed ID: 23148203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defining the limits of detection for chromosome rearrangements in the preimplantation embryo using next generation sequencing.
    Cuman C; Beyer CE; Brodie D; Fullston T; Lin JI; Willats E; Zander-Fox D; Mullen J
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1566-1576. PubMed ID: 30007310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of blastocysts.
    Huang J; Yan L; Lu S; Zhao N; Xie XS; Qiao J
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jun; 105(6):1532-6. PubMed ID: 26902859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confirmation rates of array-CGH in day-3 embryo and blastocyst biopsies for preimplantation genetic screening.
    Mir P; Mateu E; Mercader A; Herrer R; Rodrigo L; Vera M; Peinado V; Milán-Sánchez M; Campos-Galindo I; García-Herrero S; Simón C; Rubio C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jan; 33(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26547204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing.
    Maxwell SM; Colls P; Hodes-Wertz B; McCulloh DH; McCaffrey C; Wells D; Munné S; Grifo JA
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1414-1419.e5. PubMed ID: 27692437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos.
    Fiorentino F; Biricik A; Bono S; Spizzichino L; Cotroneo E; Cottone G; Kokocinski F; Michel CE
    Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1375-82. PubMed ID: 24613537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of mosaic and segmental aneuploidies by next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic screening can improve clinical outcomes compared to array-comparative genomic hybridization.
    Lai HH; Chuang TH; Wong LK; Lee MJ; Hsieh CL; Wang HL; Chen SU
    Mol Cytogenet; 2017; 10():14. PubMed ID: 28450889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of next-generation sequencing for comprehensive chromosome screening of embryos.
    Kung A; Munné S; Bankowski B; Coates A; Wells D
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Dec; 31(6):760-9. PubMed ID: 26520420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of Next-Generation Sequencer for 24-Chromosome Aneuploidy Screening in Human Embryos.
    Sachdeva K; Discutido R; Albuz F; Almekosh R; Peramo B
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2017 Nov; 21(11):674-680. PubMed ID: 28885040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polar body analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization accurately predicts aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age.
    Christopikou D; Tsorva E; Economou K; Shelley P; Davies S; Mastrominas M; Handyside AH
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1426-34. PubMed ID: 23477909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage.
    Capalbo A; Wright G; Elliott T; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Nagy ZP
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2298-307. PubMed ID: 23739221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of next-generation sequencing for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of human preimplantation embryos.
    Zheng H; Jin H; Liu L; Liu J; Wang WH
    Mol Cytogenet; 2015; 8():38. PubMed ID: 26085841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing live birth rate by preimplantation genetic screening of pooled polar bodies using array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Feichtinger M; Stopp T; Göbl C; Feichtinger E; Vaccari E; Mädel U; Laccone F; Stroh-Weigert M; Hengstschläger M; Feichtinger W; Neesen J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0128317. PubMed ID: 26024488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A preliminary study on the application of array comparative genomic hybridization for preimplantaion genetic diagnosis].
    Xie Y; Xu Y; Miao B; Zeng Y; Zhou C
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 30(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 23744315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.
    Sermon K; Capalbo A; Cohen J; Coonen E; De Rycke M; De Vos A; Delhanty J; Fiorentino F; Gleicher N; Griesinger G; Grifo J; Handyside A; Harper J; Kokkali G; Mastenbroek S; Meldrum D; Meseguer M; Montag M; Munné S; Rienzi L; Rubio C; Scott K; Scott R; Simon C; Swain J; Treff N; Ubaldi F; Vassena R; Vermeesch JR; Verpoest W; Wells D; Geraedts J
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 22(8):845-57. PubMed ID: 27256483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.