390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28537814)
1. A human-oriented framework for developing assistive service robots.
McGinn C; Cullinan MF; Culleton M; Kelly K
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Apr; 13(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 28537814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Voice Control Interface Prototype for Assistive Robots for People Living with Upper Limb Disabilities.
Poirier S; Routhier F; Campeau-Lecours A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():46-52. PubMed ID: 31374605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of assistive robotics in the lives of persons with disability.
Brose SW; Weber DJ; Salatin BA; Grindle GG; Wang H; Vazquez JJ; Cooper RA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 89(6):509-21. PubMed ID: 20134305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing a social and assistive robot for seniors.
Eftring H; Frennert S
Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2016 Jun; 49(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 27220732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Social service robots to support independent living : Experiences from a field trial.
Pripfl J; Körtner T; Batko-Klein D; Hebesberger D; Weninger M; Gisinger C
Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2016 Jun; 49(4):282-7. PubMed ID: 27220733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A concept of needs-oriented design and evaluation of assistive robots based on ICF.
Matsumoto Y; Nishida Y; Motomura Y; Okawa Y
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975437. PubMed ID: 22275637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assistive robots to improve the independent living of older persons: results from a needs study.
Fiorini L; De Mul M; Fabbricotti I; Limosani R; Vitanza A; D'Onofrio G; Tsui M; Sancarlo D; Giuliani F; Greco A; Guiot D; Senges E; Cavallo F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 31329000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative performance analysis of M-IMU/EMG and voice user interfaces for assistive robots.
Laureiti C; Cordella F; di Luzio FS; Saccucci S; Davalli A; Sacchetti R; Zollo L
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1001-1006. PubMed ID: 28813952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting.
Wu YH; Wrobel J; Cornuet M; Kerhervé H; Damnée S; Rigaud AS
Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():801-11. PubMed ID: 24855349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multi-perspective evaluation of a service robot for seniors: the voice of different stakeholders.
Bedaf S; Marti P; Amirabdollahian F; de Witte L
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Aug; 13(6):592-599. PubMed ID: 28758532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrating medical, assistive, and universal design products and technologies: Assistive Technology Service Method (ATSM).
Elsaesser LJ; Bauer S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Jul; 7(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 22188388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eye-gaze control of a wheelchair mounted 6DOF assistive robot for activities of daily living.
Sunny MSH; Zarif MII; Rulik I; Sanjuan J; Rahman MH; Ahamed SI; Wang I; Schultz K; Brahmi B
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Dec; 18(1):173. PubMed ID: 34922590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A high-resolution tongue-based joystick to enable robot control for individuals with severe disabilities.
Mohammadi M; Knoche H; Gaihede M; Bentsen B; Andreasen Struijk LNS
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():1043-1048. PubMed ID: 31374767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrating end-user feedback in the concept stage of development of a novel sensor access system for environmental control.
Fager SK; Sorenson T; Butte S; Nelson A; Banerjee N; Robucci R
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 May; 13(4):366-372. PubMed ID: 28524710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immersive participatory design of assistive robots to support older adults.
Olatunji SA; Nguyen V; Cakmak M; Edsinger A; Kemp CC; Rogers WA; Mahajan HP
Ergonomics; 2024 Jun; 67(6):717-731. PubMed ID: 38351886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usability test of KNRC self-feeding robot.
Song WK; Song WJ; Kim Y; Kim J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650501. PubMed ID: 24187316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Middlesex University rehabilitation robot.
Parsons B; White A; Prior S; Warner P
J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(4):151-62. PubMed ID: 16012066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A robot goes to rehab: a novel gamified system for long-term stroke rehabilitation using a socially assistive robot-methodology and usability testing.
Feingold-Polak R; Barzel O; Levy-Tzedek S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jul; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 34321035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Should assistive robots have a "personality"? : Potential of simplified robot personalities].
Mayer P; Panek P
Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2016 Jun; 49(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 27245227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task-oriented rehabilitation robotics.
Schweighofer N; Choi Y; Winstein C; Gordon J
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 91(11 Suppl 3):S270-9. PubMed ID: 23080042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
