365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28538397)
1. Quality of reporting of multivariable logistic regression models in Chinese clinical medical journals.
Zhang YY; Zhou XB; Wang QZ; Zhu XY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 May; 96(21):e6972. PubMed ID: 28538397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reporting quality of multivariable logistic regression in selected Indian medical journals.
Kumar R; Indrayan A; Chhabra P
J Postgrad Med; 2012; 58(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 22718056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of quality of multivariable logistic regression in Indian medical journals using multilevel modeling approach.
Kumar R; Indrayan A; Chhabra P
Indian J Public Health; 2016; 60(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 27350702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting and methodological quality of survival analysis in articles published in Chinese oncology journals.
Zhu X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Sun X; Liu H; Zhang Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9204. PubMed ID: 29390340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality Reporting of Multivariable Regression Models in Observational Studies: Review of a Representative Sample of Articles Published in Biomedical Journals.
Real J; Forné C; Roso-Llorach A; Martínez-Sánchez JM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(20):e3653. PubMed ID: 27196467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15770041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of two journals found that articles using multivariable logistic regression frequently did not report commonly recommended assumptions.
Ottenbacher KJ; Ottenbacher HR; Tooth L; Ostir GV
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1147-52. PubMed ID: 15567630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of logistic regression reporting in current obstetrics and gynecology literature.
Mikolajczyk RT; DiSilvestro A; Zhang J
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):413-9. PubMed ID: 18238980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Assessment of multivariate logistic regression analysis in articles published in Turkish cardiology journals].
Tanboğa IH; Kurt M; Işik T; Kaya A; Ekinci M; Aksakal E; Sevimli S; Cayli M
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2012 Mar; 40(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22710601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Support for reporting guidelines in surgical journals needs improvement: A systematic review.
Agha RA; Barai I; Rajmohan S; Lee S; Anwar MO; Fowler AJ; Orgill DP; Altman DG
Int J Surg; 2017 Sep; 45():14-17. PubMed ID: 28673865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.
Choi J; Jun JH; Kang BK; Kim KH; Lee MS
Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():429. PubMed ID: 25373427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CONSORT in China: past development and future direction.
Song TJ; Leng HF; Zhong LL; Wu TX; Bian ZX
Trials; 2015 Jun; 16():243. PubMed ID: 26026311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting and Guidelines in Propensity Score Analysis: A Systematic Review of Cancer and Cancer Surgical Studies.
Yao XI; Wang X; Speicher PJ; Hwang ES; Cheng P; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Schrag D; Pang HH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Aug; 109(8):. PubMed ID: 28376195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Logistic regression models in obstetrics and gynecology literature.
Khan KS; Chien PF; Dwarakanath LS
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 93(6):1014-20. PubMed ID: 10362173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review.
Wu R; Glen P; Ramsay T; Martel G
Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():70. PubMed ID: 24972453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research.
Hayati Rezvan P; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():30. PubMed ID: 25880850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Statistical reporting requirements for medical journals: Amplifications and explanations].
Yan RH; Peng XX
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 40(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 30669740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design and level of evidence of studies published in two Brazilian medical journals recently indexed in the ISI Web of Science database.
Torloni MR; Riera R
Sao Paulo Med J; 2010 Jul; 128(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 21120430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reporting of various methodological and statistical parameters in negative studies published in prominent Indian Medical Journals: a systematic review.
Charan J; Saxena D
J Postgrad Med; 2014; 60(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 25370542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis.
Hays M; Andrews M; Wilson R; Callender D; O'Malley PG; Douglas K
BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011082. PubMed ID: 27470506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
