These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28538593)

  • 1. Dynamic Response of the Lumbar Spine to Whole-body Vibration Under a Compressive Follower Preload.
    Guo LX; Fan W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Feb; 43(3):E143-E153. PubMed ID: 28538593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element investigation of the effect of nucleus removal on vibration characteristics of the lumbar spine under a compressive follower preload.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Feb; 78():342-351. PubMed ID: 29202297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of different frequencies of axial cyclic loading on time-domain vibration response of the lumbar spine: A finite element study.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jul; 86():75-81. PubMed ID: 28511121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Posterior Screw Fixation in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion During Whole Body Vibration: A Finite Element Study.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1086-e1093. PubMed ID: 29605701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Single-Level Disc Degeneration on Dynamic Response of the Whole Lumbar Spine to Vertical Vibration.
    Guo LX; Fan W
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():510-518. PubMed ID: 28606581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexion-extension response of the thoracolumbar spine under compressive follower preload.
    Stanley SK; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Paxinos O; Carandang G; Zindrick MR; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):E510-4. PubMed ID: 15543052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of bilateral pedicle screw fixation on vibration response of the disc degenerated human lumbar spine: A finite element stress analysis.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Technol Health Care; 2019; 27(4):441-450. PubMed ID: 31033465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential response to vibration of three forms of scoliosis during axial cyclic loading: a finite element study.
    Jia S; Li Y; Xie J; Tian T; Zhang S; Han L
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Aug; 20(1):370. PubMed ID: 31409412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical response of lumbar facet joints under follower preload: a finite element study.
    Du CF; Yang N; Guo JC; Huang YP; Zhang C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Mar; 17():126. PubMed ID: 26980002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e81-e88. PubMed ID: 33647495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of material properties of intervertebral disc on dynamic response of the human lumbar spine to vertical vibration: a finite element sensitivity study.
    Guo LX; Fan W
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):221-229. PubMed ID: 30083805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of the influence of vertical whole-body vibration on biomechanics of spinal segments after lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Jun; 86():105389. PubMed ID: 34052692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vibration characteristics of the human spine under axial cyclic loads: effect of frequency and damping.
    Guo LX; Teo EC; Lee KK; Zhang QH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 15770177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation.
    Barrey C; Rousseau MA; Persohn S; Campana S; Perrin G; Skalli W
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():S155-65. PubMed ID: 25845316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of compressive follower preload on the flexion-extension response of the human lumbar spine.
    Patwardhan AG; Havey RM; Carandang G; Simonds J; Voronov LI; Ghanayem AJ; Meade KP; Gavin TM; Paxinos O
    J Orthop Res; 2003 May; 21(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 12706029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intervertebral disc degeneration alters lumbar spine segmental stiffness in all modes of loading under a compressive follower load.
    Zirbel SA; Stolworthy DK; Howell LL; Bowden AE
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1134-47. PubMed ID: 23507531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of non-fusion dynamic stabilization on biomechanical responses of the implanted lumbar spine during whole-body vibration.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Aug; 192():105441. PubMed ID: 32172078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of complications and fusion outcomes of fused lumbar spine with or without fixation system under whole-body vibration.
    Wang QD; Guo LX
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Jun; 59(6):1223-1233. PubMed ID: 34080095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effects of Physiological Biomechanical Loading on Intradiscal Pressure and Annulus Stress in Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zahari SN; Latif MJA; Rahim NRA; Kadir MRA; Kamarul T
    J Healthc Eng; 2017; 2017():9618940. PubMed ID: 29065672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.