These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28538773)

  • 1. Propensity scores: a tool to help quantify treatment effects in observational studies.
    Patino CM; Ferreira JC
    J Bras Pneumol; 2017; 43(2):86. PubMed ID: 28538773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.
    Stuart BL; Grebel LE; Butler CC; Hood K; Verheij TJM; Little P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Sep; 67(662):e643-e649. PubMed ID: 28760739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Propensity score studies are unlikely to underestimate treatment effects in critical care medicine: a critical reanalysis.
    Kitsios GD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):467-9. PubMed ID: 25555686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternatives to Randomised Controlled Trials for the Poor, the Impatient, and When Evaluating Emerging Technologies.
    Mani K; Björck M
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 Apr; 57(4):598-599. PubMed ID: 30509892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining apples and oranges obtains common features of fruit.
    Zhang Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):466-7. PubMed ID: 25616994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Not Available].
    Buzzetti R
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):531. PubMed ID: 31808436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Observational studies using propensity score analysis underestimated the effect sizes in critical care medicine.
    Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):932-9. PubMed ID: 24774469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical power in parallel group point exposure studies with time-to-event outcomes: an empirical comparison of the performance of randomized controlled trials and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach.
    Austin PC; Schuster T; Platt RW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26472109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How Do Propensity Score Methods Measure Up in the Presence of Measurement Error? A Monte Carlo Study.
    Rodríguez De Gil P; Bellara AP; Lanehart RE; Lee RS; Kim ES; Kromrey JD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):520-32. PubMed ID: 26610250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.
    Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3357-72. PubMed ID: 23553813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.
    Schulte PJ; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 29750691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity-score analysis in thoracic surgery: When, why, and an introduction to how.
    Winger DG; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 151(6):1484-7. PubMed ID: 27207121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.
    Desai RJ; Franklin JM
    BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5657. PubMed ID: 31645336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing clinical trials for amblyopia.
    Holmes JM
    Vision Res; 2015 Sep; 114():41-7. PubMed ID: 25752747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research.
    Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I
    BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What effect is really being measured? An alternative explanation of paradoxical phenomena in studies of osteoarthritis progression.
    Zhang Y; Neogi T; Hunter D; Roemer F; Niu J
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2014 May; 66(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 24877249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data.
    Giordano SH
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2015; ():e330-5. PubMed ID: 25993193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simple, flexible, and effective covariate-adaptive treatment allocation procedure.
    Loux TM
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(22):3775-87. PubMed ID: 23637002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized controlled trials vs. observational studies: why not just live together?
    Faraoni D; Schaefer ST
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 27769172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.