These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28539215)

  • 1. Comparison and validation of an in vitro skin sensitization strategy using a data set of 33 chemical references.
    Clouet E; Kerdine-Römer S; Ferret PJ
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Dec; 45(Pt 3):374-385. PubMed ID: 28539215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
    Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
    J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.
    Hirota M; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Takenouchi O; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1333-47. PubMed ID: 25824844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction.
    Otsubo Y; Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():118-124. PubMed ID: 28602621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Takenouchi O; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1318-32. PubMed ID: 25820183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.
    Strickland J; Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Allen D; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Kleinstreuer N
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 27480324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization?
    Patlewicz G; Casati S; Basketter DA; Asturiol D; Roberts DW; Lepoittevin JP; Worth AP; Aschberger K
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():147-155. PubMed ID: 27569201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of Spectro-DPRA, KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT to estimation of the skin sensitization potential of cosmetics ingredients.
    Cho SA; Choi M; Park SR; An S; Park JH
    J Appl Toxicol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):300-312. PubMed ID: 31680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.
    Strickland J; Zang Q; Kleinstreuer N; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Lowit A; Allen D; Casey W
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1150-62. PubMed ID: 26851134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro testing strategy for assessing the skin sensitizing potential of "difficult to test" cosmetic ingredients.
    Bergal M; Puginier M; Gerbeix C; Groux H; Roso A; Cottrez F; Milius A
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Jun; 65():104781. PubMed ID: 32001296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian integrated testing strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization potency assessment: a decision support system for quantitative weight of evidence and adaptive testing strategy.
    Jaworska JS; Natsch A; Ryan C; Strickland J; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    Arch Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 89(12):2355-83. PubMed ID: 26612363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods.
    Urbisch D; Mehling A; Guth K; Ramirez T; Honarvar N; Kolle S; Landsiedel R; Jaworska J; Kern PS; Gerberick F; Natsch A; Emter R; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Sakaguchi H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):337-51. PubMed ID: 25541156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of in vitro assays for the assessment of the skin sensitization hazard of functional polysiloxanes and silanes.
    Petry T; Bosch A; Coste X; Eigler D; Germain P; Seidel S; Jean PA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Mar; 84():64-76. PubMed ID: 28017767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Nukada Y; Miyazawa M; Kazutoshi S; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Mar; 27(2):609-18. PubMed ID: 23149339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.
    Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Hirota M; Sakaguchi H; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1150-60. PubMed ID: 22796097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of dermal sensitization potential for industrial or agricultural chemicals with EpiSensA.
    Mizumachi H; LeBaron MJ; Settivari RS; Miyazawa M; Marty MS; Sakaguchi H
    J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):915-927. PubMed ID: 33124094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of eight unsaturated and one saturated lipid compounds.
    Kreiling R; Gehrke H; Broschard TH; Dreeßen B; Eigler D; Hart D; Höpflinger V; Kleber M; Kupny J; Li Q; Ungeheuer P; Sauer UG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():262-276. PubMed ID: 28958912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).
    Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Sakaguchi H; Sono S; Mugita N; Hirota M; Miyazawa M; Ito Y; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Dec; 65(6):343-53. PubMed ID: 21767275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconstructed human epidermis-based testing strategy of skin sensitization potential and potency classification using epidermal sensitization assay and in silico data.
    Mizumachi H; Suzuki S; Sakuma M; Natsui M; Imai N; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 44(3):415-427. PubMed ID: 37846211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.
    Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.