These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28540000)

  • 1. Response of the Pre-Oriented Goal-Directed Attention to Usual and Unusual Distractors: A Preliminary Study.
    Baghdadi G; Towhidkhah F; Rostami R; Raza M
    Basic Clin Neurosci; 2017; 8(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 28540000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in cross-dimensional texture segregation.
    Ghirardelli TG; Egeth HE
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Jul; 60(5):826-38. PubMed ID: 9682607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors.
    Vromen JM; Lipp OV; Remington RW; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2266-79. PubMed ID: 27234013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.
    Tassinari G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Marzi CA; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(1A):55-71. PubMed ID: 3574651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociable effects of salience on attention and goal-directed action.
    Moher J; Anderson BA; Song JH
    Curr Biol; 2015 Aug; 25(15):2040-6. PubMed ID: 26190076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Movement and focused attention: a failure to replicate.
    Kramer AF; Tham MP; Yeh YY
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):537-46. PubMed ID: 1780201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Functional Consequences of Social Attention for Memory-guided Attention Orienting and Anticipatory Neural Dynamics.
    Doherty BR; van Ede F; Fraser A; Patai EZ; Nobre AC; Scerif G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 May; 31(5):686-698. PubMed ID: 30726182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing.
    Kramer AF; Jacobson A
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Sep; 50(3):267-84. PubMed ID: 1754368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mutations paradigm: assessing the time course of distractor processing.
    Max R; Tsal Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2344-55. PubMed ID: 26084775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interplay of goal-driven and stimulus-driven influences on spatial orienting.
    Otten M; Schreij D; Los SA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1642-54. PubMed ID: 27259486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention.
    Robinson CW; Hawthorn AM; Rahman AN
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2564. PubMed ID: 30618983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goal-driven attentional capture by appetitive and aversive smoking-related cues in nicotine-dependent smokers.
    Brown CRH; Forster S; Duka T
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2018 Sep; 190():209-215. PubMed ID: 30055425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture.
    Lu J; Tian L; Zhang J; Wang J; Ye C; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16314. PubMed ID: 29176675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect.
    Madill M; Murray JE
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():591. PubMed ID: 28450848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced insular/prefrontal connectivity when resisting from emotional distraction during visual search.
    Pedale T; Macaluso E; Santangelo V
    Brain Struct Funct; 2019 Jul; 224(6):2009-2026. PubMed ID: 31111208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effects of distractors on sustained attention in children with attention-deficit hyperactive disorder].
    Xu Y; Zhou XL; Wang YF
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 42(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 14990106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.