These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28540635)

  • 1. Wire bias in coronary measurement using optical coherence tomography.
    Danson EJ; Hansen P; Bhindi R
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2018 Jul; 33(3):217-223. PubMed ID: 28540635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
    Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
    Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
    Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Algorithmic Approach for Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Stent Implantation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Shlofmitz E; Shlofmitz RA; Galougahi KK; Rahim HM; Virmani R; Hill JM; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Maehara A; Landmesser U; Stone GW; Ali ZA
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2018 Jul; 7(3):329-344. PubMed ID: 29983145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stuck OCT Catheter: An Unanticipated Complication.
    Chhikara S; Datta R; Shrivastava A; Gupta A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E149-E150. PubMed ID: 35100558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Ha FJ; Giblett JP; Nerlekar N; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; West NEJ; Brown AJ
    Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1267-1276. PubMed ID: 28818410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of the proximal optimization technique on crossover stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions in the 3D-OCT bifurcation registry.
    Murasato Y; Mori T; Okamura T; Nagoshi R; Fujimura T; Yamawaki M; Ono S; Serikawa T; Nakao F; Shite J;
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 35(6):981-990. PubMed ID: 30887408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
    Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Role of optical coherence tomography to optimize complex coronary interventions].
    Pescetelli I; Guagliumi G
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2020 Apr; 21(4 Suppl 2):12S-21S. PubMed ID: 32250365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suboptimal stent deployment is associated with subacute stent thrombosis: optical coherence tomography insights from a multicenter matched study. From the CLI Foundation investigators: the CLI-THRO study.
    Prati F; Kodama T; Romagnoli E; Gatto L; Di Vito L; Ramazzotti V; Chisari A; Marco V; Cremonesi A; Parodi G; Albertucci M; Alfonso F
    Am Heart J; 2015 Feb; 169(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 25641534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optical coherence tomography assessment of incidence, morphological characteristics, and spontaneous healing course of edge dissections following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Antonsen L; Thayssen P; Hansen HS; Junker A; Veien KT; Hansen KN; Hougaard M; Jensen LO
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 223():466-474. PubMed ID: 27544607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-Specific Modeling of Stented Coronary Arteries Reconstructed from Optical Coherence Tomography: Towards a Widespread Clinical Use of Fluid Dynamics Analyses.
    Chiastra C; Migliori S; Burzotta F; Dubini G; Migliavacca F
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2018 Apr; 11(2):156-172. PubMed ID: 29282628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography for bioresorbable scaffold luminal investigation: a comparison with optical coherence tomography.
    Collet C; Sotomi Y; Cavalcante R; Asano T; Miyazaki Y; Tenekecioglu E; Kistlaar P; Zeng Y; Suwanasson P; de Winter RJ; Nieman K; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 33(3):431-439. PubMed ID: 27896495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Co-registration of optical coherence tomography and X-ray angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention. the Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization (DOCTOR) fusion study.
    Hebsgaard L; Nielsen TM; Tu S; Krusell LR; Maeng M; Veien KT; Raungaard B; Terkelsen CJ; Kaltoft A; Reiber JH; Lassen JF; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 182():272-8. PubMed ID: 25585362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which do you prefer, OCT or IVUS?
    Tobis J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):236. PubMed ID: 26198063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External elastic lamina vs. luminal diameter measurement for determining stent diameter by optical coherence tomography: an ILUMIEN III substudy.
    Shlofmitz E; Jeremias A; Parviz Y; Karimi Galougahi K; Redfors B; Petrossian G; Edens M; Matsumura M; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Stone GW; Shlofmitz RA; Ali ZA
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 22(7):753-759. PubMed ID: 33167000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.