These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28541076)

  • 1. Brand name confusion: Subjective and objective measures of orthographic similarity.
    Burt JS; McFarlane KA; Kelly SJ; Humphreys MS; Weatherall K; Burrell RG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):320-335. PubMed ID: 28541076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1600-13. PubMed ID: 16873111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
    Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word and pseudoword superiority effects in a shallow orthography language: the role of hemispheric lateralization.
    Ripamonti E; Traficante D; Crippa F; Luzzattii C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Apr; 118(2):411-28. PubMed ID: 24897877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priming vs. rhyming: orthographic and phonological representations in the left and right hemispheres.
    Lindell AK; Lum JA
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 18556102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonological-orthographic consistency for Japanese words and its impact on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Miyamura S; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):126-146. PubMed ID: 27808550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are brand names special words? Letter visual-similarity affects the identification of brand names, but not common words.
    Perea M; Baciero A; Labusch M; Fernández-López M; Marcet A
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Aug; 113(3):835-852. PubMed ID: 35107840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.
    Arciuli J; Cupples L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):920-48. PubMed ID: 16608755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the difference between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly five pixels: orthographic structure biases the perceived length of letter strings.
    Chetail F; Content A
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):243-9. PubMed ID: 24240087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can I order a burger at rnacdonalds.com? Visual similarity effects of multi-letter combinations at the early stages of word recognition.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 29094993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letter-similarity effects in braille word recognition.
    Baciero A; Gomez P; Duñabeitia JA; Perea M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jul; 76(7):1632-1640. PubMed ID: 36382890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masked priming by misspellings: Word frequency moderates the effects of SOA and prime-target similarity.
    Burt JS
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):262-77. PubMed ID: 26530310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in orthographic priming relate to phonological decoding skill in adults.
    Welcome SE; Trammel ER
    Cogn Process; 2017 May; 18(2):119-128. PubMed ID: 28188455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A rose by any other name is not the same: the role of orthographic knowledge in homophone confusion errors.
    Starr MS; Fleming KK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):744-60. PubMed ID: 11394678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.
    Primativo S; Reilly J; Crutch SJ
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41(3):659-685. PubMed ID: 26901571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating Orthographic Information Across Time and Space.
    Snell J; Bertrand D; Meeter M; Grainger J
    Exp Psychol; 2018 Jan; 65(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 29415643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there lexical competition in the recognition of L2 words for different-script bilinguals? An examination using masked priming with Japanese-English bilinguals.
    Nakayama M; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1168-1185. PubMed ID: 29683717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A backwards glance at words: Using reversed-interior masked primes to test models of visual word identification.
    Davis CJ; Lupker SJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189056. PubMed ID: 29244824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disentangling cross-language orthographic neighborhood from markedness effects in L2 visual word recognition.
    Commissaire E; Audusseau J; Casalis S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):353-359. PubMed ID: 30187442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.