224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28541156)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of two plating configurations for fixation of a simple transverse caudal mandibular fracture model in cats.
Greiner CL; Verstraete FJM; Stover SM; Garcia TC; Leale D; Arzi B
Am J Vet Res; 2017 Jun; 78(6):702-711. PubMed ID: 28541156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of locking versus nonlocking 2.0-mm malleable L-miniplate fixation of simulated caudal mandibular fractures in cats.
Kot CCS; Verstraete FJM; Garcia TC; Stover SM; Arzi B
Am J Vet Res; 2022 Jun; 83(8):. PubMed ID: 35895785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of two plating configurations for critical-sized defects of the mandible in dogs.
Arzi B; Stover SM; Garcia TC; Leale DM; Verstraete FJ
Am J Vet Res; 2016 May; 77(5):445-51. PubMed ID: 27111011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical properties of plate constructs for feline ilial fracture gap stabilization.
Schmierer PA; Smolders LA; Zderic I; Gueorguiev B; Pozzi A; Knell SC
Vet Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 30422336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of pigeon (Columba livia) cadaver intact humeri and ostectomized humeri stabilized with caudally applied titanium locking plate or stainless steel nonlocking plate constructs.
Darrow BG; Biskup JJ; Weigel JP; Jones MP; Xie X; Liaw PK; Tharpe JL; Sharma A; Penumadu D
Am J Vet Res; 2017 May; 78(5):570-578. PubMed ID: 28441055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of plate type and placement on the immobilization of bilateral equine mandibular osteotomies: Ex vivo study.
Durket E; Kersh K; Dembek K; Riedesel E; Silverstone A; Kraus KH
Vet Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(8):1450-1455. PubMed ID: 30951203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of a 3.5-mm conical coupling plating system and a 3.5-mm locking compression plate applied as plate-rod constructs to an experimentally created fracture gap in femurs of canine cadavers.
Tremolada G; Lewis DD; Paragnani KL; Conrad BP; Kim SE; Pozzi A
Am J Vet Res; 2017 Jun; 78(6):712-717. PubMed ID: 28541152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of screw position on single cycle to failure in bending and torsion of a locking plate-rod construct in a synthetic feline femoral gap model.
Niederhäuser SK; Tepic S; Weber UT
Am J Vet Res; 2015 May; 76(5):402-10. PubMed ID: 25909372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and a novel pedicle screw external fixation to repair equine mandibular fractures.
Monck SL; McGilvray KC; Easley JT
Vet Surg; 2020 Jul; 49(5):997-1006. PubMed ID: 32294301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.
Haug RH; Street CC; Goltz M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1319-26. PubMed ID: 12420268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ex vivo comparison of lateral plate repairs of experimental oblique ilial fractures in cats.
Paulick L; Knell SC; Smolders LA; Pozzi A; Schmierer PA
Vet Surg; 2022 Jan; 51(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 34637153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.
Trease C; McIff T; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 16039369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical Evaluation of Locking, Nonlocking, and Hybrid Plating Constructs Using a Locking Compression Plate in a Canine Synthetic Bone Model.
Rowe-Guthrie KM; Markel MD; Bleedorn JA
Vet Surg; 2015 Oct; 44(7):838-42. PubMed ID: 26287445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of mono- and bicortical screws in an experimentally induced gap fracture.
Demner D; Garcia TC; Serdy MG; Hayashi K; Nir BA; Stover SM
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 25327936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complex distal humerus fractures-comparison of polyaxial locking and nonlocking screw configurations-a preliminary biomechanical study.
Hungerer S; Wipf F; von Oldenburg G; Augat P; Penzkofer R
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Mar; 28(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 23736772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distal Ulna Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plating Constructs.
Collins M; Hart A; Hines J; Steffen T; Harvey EJ; Martineau PA
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Aug; 28(8):470-5. PubMed ID: 24121982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of two alternative tibial plateau leveling osteotomy plates with the original standard in an axially loaded gap model: an in vitro study.
Kloc PA; Kowaleski MP; Litsky AS; Brown NO; Johnson KA
Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19152616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of a locking and nonlocking reconstruction plate in an osteoporotic calcaneal fracture model.
Blake MH; Owen JR; Sanford TS; Wayne JS; Adelaar RS
Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Apr; 32(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 21733448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biomechanical evaluation and assessment of the accuracy of reduction of two methods of acetabular osteotomy fixation in dogs.
Stubbs WP; Lewis DD; Miller GJ; Quarterman C; Hosgood G
Vet Surg; 1998; 27(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 9749513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
