257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28541824)
1. Novel tests for evaluating two ROC curves under paired samples.
Hwang YT; Wang CC
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 28541824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.
Hsieh HN; Su HY; Zhou XH
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3108-23. PubMed ID: 19691022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
Hand DJ
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1502-10. PubMed ID: 20087877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semi-parametric estimation of the binormal ROC curve for a continuous diagnostic test.
Cai T; Moskowitz CS
Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):573-86. PubMed ID: 15475420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Wan S; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
Zou GY; Yue L
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5077-90. PubMed ID: 23824874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate likelihood inference for the volume under the ROC surface.
Ruli E; Ventura L
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2020 Aug; 3(4):e1206. PubMed ID: 32794638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Profile-likelihood inference for highly accurate diagnostic tests.
Tsimikas JV; Bosch RJ; Coull BA; El Barmi H
Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):946-56. PubMed ID: 12495149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model.
Zhang D; Zhang B
Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):678-96. PubMed ID: 24648388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct estimation of volume under the ROC surface with verification bias.
Shi S; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):553-581. PubMed ID: 37470408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smooth ROC curve estimation via Bernstein polynomials.
Wang D; Cai X
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251959. PubMed ID: 34032801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.
Zhou XH
Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for a diagnostic test with a limit of detection in the absence of a gold standard.
Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Utts JM; Gardner IA
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2090-106. PubMed ID: 20603894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
