These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28542013)

  • 1. Location Modification Factors for Potential Dose Estimation.
    Snyder SF; Barnett JM
    Health Phys; 2017 Jul; 113(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 28542013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's CAP88 PC Versions 3.0 and 4.0.
    Jannik T; Farfan EB; Dixon K; Newton J; Sailors C; Johnson L; Moore K; Stahman R
    Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2 Suppl 2):S169-75. PubMed ID: 26102326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical criteria to establish bioassay programs.
    Lopez-Fidalgo J; Sanchez G
    Health Phys; 2005 Oct; 89(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 16155454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What we know and what we do not know.
    McDonald JC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 15843393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SECOND LATIN AMERICAN INTERCOMPARISON ON INTERNAL DOSE ASSESSMENT.
    Rojo A; Puerta N; Gossio S; Gómez Parada I; Cruz Suarez R; López E; Medina C; Lastra Boylan J; Pinheiro Ramos M; Mora Ramírez E; Alves Dos Reis A; Yánez H; Rubio J; Vironneau Janicek L; Somarriba Vanegas F; Puerta Ortiz J; Salas Ramírez M; López Bejerano G; da Silva T; Miri Oliveira C; Terán M; Alfaro M; García T; Angeles A; Duré Romero E; Farias de Lima F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):49-53. PubMed ID: 26503854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Cloudshine Gamma Dose Calculations in the CAP-88 Dispersion Model.
    McNaughton MW; Gillis JM; Ruedig E; Whicker JJ; Fuehne DP
    Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):414-419. PubMed ID: 28234703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical Assessment of Internal Surface Smoothness and Particle Transmission to the American National Standard ANSI/HPS N13.1-2011.
    Fritz BG; Barnett JM
    Health Phys; 2015 Nov; 109(3 Suppl 3):S200-4. PubMed ID: 26425982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remarks on representative ground-level air monitoring.
    Wershofen H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Nov; 81():284-9. PubMed ID: 23566807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
    Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
    Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occupational exposure in Portugal in 1999.
    Alves JG; Martins MB; Amaral EM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):43-7. PubMed ID: 11586752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. STABILITY OF THE NEUTRON DOSE DETERMINATION ALGORITHM FOR PERSONAL NEUTRON DOSEMETERS AT DIFFERENT RADON GAS EXPOSURES.
    Mayer S; Boschung M; Butterweck G; Assenmacher F; Hohmann E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):154-7. PubMed ID: 26396265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method for the determination of thoron and thoron progeny concentration at workplaces and thoron concentration in calibration chambers.
    Falk R; Akerblom G; Nyblom L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 18718963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Work to save dose: contrasting effective dose rates from radon exposure in workplaces and residences against the backdrop of public and occupational regulatory limits.
    Whicker JJ; McNaughton MW
    Health Phys; 2009 Sep; 97(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 19667808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a quality assurance programme for external personal dosimetry in Slovenia.
    Breznik B; Janzekovic H; Stuhec M; Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):49-52. PubMed ID: 11586753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Current Center of Site Annual Neshap Dose Modeling at the Savannah River Site with Other Assessment Methods.
    Minter KM; Jannik GT; Stagich BH; Dixon KL; Newton JR
    Health Phys; 2018 Apr; 114(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 29481531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radon as a tracer of daily, seasonal and spatial air movements in the Underground Tourist Route "Coal Mine" (SW Poland).
    Tchorz-Trzeciakiewicz DE; Parkitny T
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Nov; 149():90-8. PubMed ID: 26225833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetry at an interim storage for spent nuclear fuel.
    Králík M; Kulich V; Studeny J; Pokorny P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):549-54. PubMed ID: 17526479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation and measurements of radioactive air emission and off-site doses at SLAC.
    Chan I; Liu J; Tran H
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S115-8. PubMed ID: 23803664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconstruction of A Radiological Release Using Aerosol Sampling.
    Hayes RB
    Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):326-337. PubMed ID: 28234691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of inspection and cleaning of two radionuclide air-sampling systems based on the requirements of ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999.
    Barnett JM; Ballinger MY; Gervais TL; Douglas DD; Edwards DL
    Health Phys; 2004 Apr; 86(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 15057063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.