These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28542248)

  • 21. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception.
    Hauch V; Blandón-Gitlin I; Masip J; Sporer SL
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):307-42. PubMed ID: 25387767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
    Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars.
    Verigin BL; Meijer EH; Bogaard G; Vrij A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225566. PubMed ID: 31794563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Functional MRI analysis of deception among people with antisocial personality disorders].
    Jiang W; Liao J; Liu H; Tang Y; Wang W
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Nov; 37(11):1141-6. PubMed ID: 23202625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using Named Entities for Computer-Automated Verbal Deception Detection.
    Kleinberg B; Mozes M; Arntz A; Verschuere B
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):714-723. PubMed ID: 28940300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Deception detection: State of the art and future prospects.
    Masip J
    Psicothema; 2017 May; 29(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 28438235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Been there before? Examining "familiarity" as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions.
    Knieps M; Granhag PA; Vrij A
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():677. PubMed ID: 25071648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.
    Fenn E; Blandón-Gitlin I; Coons J; Pineda C; Echon R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():112-22. PubMed ID: 26366466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview.
    Bogaard G; van de Bovekamp AM; Colwell K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104112. PubMed ID: 38070326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ID-Check: Online Concealed Information Test Reveals True Identity.
    Verschuere B; Kleinberg B
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61 Suppl 1():S237-40. PubMed ID: 26390033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How deception and believability feedback affect recall.
    Vo TVA; Gunderson CA; Ten Brinke L
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):706-714. PubMed ID: 33557706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The action dynamics of overcoming the truth.
    Duran ND; Dale R; McNamara DS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 20702866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; de la Riva C; Herrero C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():45-55. PubMed ID: 27219533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Will the truth come out? the effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores.
    Vrij A; Akehurst L; Soukara S; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Jun; 26(3):261-83. PubMed ID: 12061619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.