254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28542313)
1. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding assays to detect invasive invertebrate species in the Great Lakes.
Klymus KE; Marshall NT; Stepien CA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177643. PubMed ID: 28542313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrating invasive species risk assessment into environmental DNA metabarcoding reference libraries.
Mahon AR; Grey EK; Jerde CL
Ecol Appl; 2023 Jan; 33(1):e2730. PubMed ID: 36054696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.
Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the impact of the threatened crucian carp (Carassius carassius) on pond invertebrate diversity: A comparison of conventional and molecular tools.
Harper LR; Lawson Handley L; Sayer CD; Read DS; Benucci M; Blackman RC; Hill MJ; Hänfling B
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3252-3269. PubMed ID: 33002225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of benthic invertebrate diversity and river ecological status along an urbanized gradient using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method.
Ji F; Han D; Yan L; Yan S; Zha J; Shen J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150587. PubMed ID: 34582852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Taxonomic accuracy and complementarity between bulk and eDNA metabarcoding provides an alternative to morphology for biological assessment of freshwater macroinvertebrates.
Múrria C; Wangensteen OS; Somma S; Väisänen L; Fortuño P; Arnedo MA; Prat N
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 935():173243. PubMed ID: 38761946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
Elbrecht V; Leese F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA.
Port JA; O'Donnell JL; Romero-Maraccini OC; Leary PR; Litvin SY; Nickols KJ; Yamahara KM; Kelly RP
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(2):527-41. PubMed ID: 26586544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing amphibian biomonitoring through eDNA metabarcoding.
Mu Y; Zhang J; Yang J; Wu J; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zhang X
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13931. PubMed ID: 38345249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Molecular identity crisis: environmental DNA metabarcoding meets traditional taxonomy-assessing biodiversity and freshwater mussel populations (Unionidae) in Alabama.
Hauck LL; Atkinson CL; Homyack JA; Penaluna BE; Mangum C; Coble AA; Nettles J; Thornton-Frost JE; Fix MJ
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15127. PubMed ID: 37033728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System.
Civade R; Dejean T; Valentini A; Roset N; Raymond JC; Bonin A; Taberlet P; Pont D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157366. PubMed ID: 27359116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benthic invertebrates in Svalbard fjords-when metabarcoding does not outperform traditional biodiversity assessment.
Willassen E; Westgaard JI; Kongsrud JA; Hanebrekke T; Buhl-Mortensen P; Holte B
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14321. PubMed ID: 36415859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement.
Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Lamare MD; Taylor HR; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 30576077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of eDNA for monitoring riverine macroinvertebrates.
Poyntz-Wright IP; Harrison XA; Pedersen S; Tyler CR
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Sep; 941():173621. PubMed ID: 38815833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
