159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28542330)
1. Quality of meta-analysis in nursing fields: An exploration based on the JBI guidelines.
Hou Y; Tian J; Zhang J; Yun R; Zhang Z; Chen KH; Zhang C; Wang B
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177648. PubMed ID: 28542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.
Jin YH; Wang GH; Sun YR; Li Q; Zhao C; Li G; Si JH; Li Y; Lu C; Shang HC
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e011514. PubMed ID: 28186925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reporting of conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of trials of pharmacological treatments.
Roseman M; Milette K; Bero LA; Coyne JC; Lexchin J; Turner EH; Thombs BD
JAMA; 2011 Mar; 305(10):1008-17. PubMed ID: 21386079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews or meta-analyses in nursing field in China.
Jin YH; Ma ET; Gao WJ; Hua W; Dou HY
Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Feb; 20(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 24580977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China].
Hou ZK; Li JS; Yu XQ; Li B; Zhou HY; Zhang YX
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 21(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 19374786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals].
Liu JP; Xia Y
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 27(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 17526167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.
Adie S; Ma D; Harris IA; Naylor JM; Craig JC
Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 25575252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of meta-analyses in the otolaryngological literature.
Rudmik LR; Walen SG; Dixon E; Dort J
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 139(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 18656713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.
Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J
Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Appraisal of meta-analysis manuscripts on eye diseases published in Chinese journals with QUOROM statement and MOOSE guidelines].
Zhu MM; Zou HD
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 47(8):732-7. PubMed ID: 22169614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A standardization study of Meta-analyses on nephropathy published in Chinese journals].
Liu JY; Zhao YL; Zhou QH; Wu YM; Zhou SG; Zhang L; Fu P
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 52(10):833-7. PubMed ID: 24378060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
