250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28542342)
1. Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma.
Kim SJ; Cho KJ; Oh S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177726. PubMed ID: 28542342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Glaucoma from Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.
Wang P; Shen J; Chang R; Moloney M; Torres M; Burkemper B; Jiang X; Rodger D; Varma R; Richter GM
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(6):422-428. PubMed ID: 32672575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine Learning Approach for Intraocular Disease Prediction Based on Aqueous Humor Immune Mediator Profiles.
Nezu N; Usui Y; Saito A; Shimizu H; Asakage M; Yamakawa N; Tsubota K; Wakabayashi Y; Narimatsu A; Umazume K; Maruyama K; Sugimoto M; Kuroda M; Goto H
Ophthalmology; 2021 Aug; 128(8):1197-1208. PubMed ID: 33484732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.
Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Zhang Z; Zangwill LM; Hao J; Lee TW; Sejnowski TJ; Weinreb RN; Goldbaum MH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1322-9. PubMed ID: 15790898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.
Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Beigzadeh A
Technol Health Care; 2016; 24(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 26409558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep Learning Approaches Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage from OCT Optic Nerve Head En Face Images and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.
Christopher M; Bowd C; Belghith A; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Fazio MA; Girkin CA; Liebmann JM; Zangwill LM
Ophthalmology; 2020 Mar; 127(3):346-356. PubMed ID: 31718841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning classifiers-based prediction of normal-tension glaucoma progression in young myopic patients.
Lee J; Kim YK; Jeoung JW; Ha A; Kim YW; Park KH
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 64(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 31848786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glaucoma Diagnosis with Machine Learning Based on Optical Coherence Tomography and Color Fundus Images.
An G; Omodaka K; Hashimoto K; Tsuda S; Shiga Y; Takada N; Kikawa T; Yokota H; Akiba M; Nakazawa T
J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():4061313. PubMed ID: 30911364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using Deep Learning and Transfer Learning to Accurately Diagnose Early-Onset Glaucoma From Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Images.
Asaoka R; Murata H; Hirasawa K; Fujino Y; Matsuura M; Miki A; Kanamoto T; Ikeda Y; Mori K; Iwase A; Shoji N; Inoue K; Yamagami J; Araie M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 198():136-145. PubMed ID: 30316669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Explainable Machine Learning Model for Glaucoma Diagnosis and Its Interpretation.
Oh S; Park Y; Cho KJ; Kim SJ
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting eyes at risk for rapid glaucoma progression based on an initial visual field test using machine learning.
Shuldiner SR; Boland MV; Ramulu PY; De Moraes CG; Elze T; Myers J; Pasquale L; Wellik S; Yohannan J
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249856. PubMed ID: 33861775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multimodal Machine Learning Using Visual Fields and Peripapillary Circular OCT Scans in Detection of Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy.
Xiong J; Li F; Song D; Tang G; He J; Gao K; Zhang H; Cheng W; Song Y; Lin F; Hu K; Wang P; Olivia Li JP; Aung T; Qiao Y; Zhang X; Ting D
Ophthalmology; 2022 Feb; 129(2):171-180. PubMed ID: 34339778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep learning classification of early normal-tension glaucoma and glaucoma suspects using Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width and RNFL.
Seo SB; Cho HK
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19042. PubMed ID: 33149191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing Glaucoma Progression Using Machine Learning Trained on Longitudinal Visual Field and Clinical Data.
Dixit A; Yohannan J; Boland MV
Ophthalmology; 2021 Jul; 128(7):1016-1026. PubMed ID: 33359887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.
Tang J; Wang X; Wan H; Lin C; Shao Z; Chang Y; Wang H; Wu Y; Zhang T; Du Y
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Oct; 22(1):278. PubMed ID: 36284327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided diagnosis of external and middle ear conditions: A machine learning approach.
Viscaino M; Maass JC; Delano PH; Torrente M; Stott C; Auat Cheein F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229226. PubMed ID: 32163427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic differentiation of Glaucoma visual field from non-glaucoma visual filed using deep convolutional neural network.
Li F; Wang Z; Qu G; Song D; Yuan Y; Xu Y; Gao K; Luo G; Xiao Z; Lam DSC; Zhong H; Qiao Y; Zhang X
BMC Med Imaging; 2018 Oct; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 30286740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal health status prediction based on maternal clinical history using machine learning techniques.
Akbulut A; Ertugrul E; Topcu V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():87-100. PubMed ID: 30119860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree.
Li K; Shi Q; Liu S; Xie Y; Liu J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(19):e25813. PubMed ID: 34106618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis based on classification of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness parameters measured by Stratus OCT.
Bizios D; Heijl A; Hougaard JL; Bengtsson B
Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 88(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 20064122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
