These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28543106)

  • 21. His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: A crossover design comparison.
    Lustgarten DL; Crespo EM; Arkhipova-Jenkins I; Lobel R; Winget J; Koehler J; Liberman E; Sheldon T
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1548-57. PubMed ID: 25828601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
    Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.
    Hua J; Chen Y; Yu J; Xiong Q; Xia Z; Xia Z; Huang Q; Kong Q; Chen H; Zhang Y; Hu J; Li J; Hu J; Chen Q; Hong K
    Heart Vessels; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1162-1174. PubMed ID: 35088204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determination of the longest intrapatient left ventricular electrical delay may predict acute hemodynamic improvement in patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Fraccaro C; Roncon L; Aggio S; Noventa F; Mazza A; Prinzen F
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Jun; 7(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 24668162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of left ventricular electrical delay on the acute hemodynamic response with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Gold MR; Leman RB; Wold N; Sturdivant JL; Yu Y
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):624-30. PubMed ID: 24446891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Avoidance of right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy improves right ventricular hemodynamics in heart failure patients.
    Lee KL; Burnes JE; Mullen TJ; Hettrick DA; Tse HF; Lau CP
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 18(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 17428272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variation in optimal hemodynamic atrio-ventricular delay of biventricular pacing with different endocardial left ventricular lead locations using precision hemodynamics.
    Butcher CJT; Cantor E; Sohaib A; Shun-Shin MJ; Haynes R; Khan H; Kyriacou A; Shi R; Chen Z; Haldar S; Cleland JGF; Hussain W; Markides V; Jones DG; Lane RE; Mason MJ; Whinnett ZI; Francis DP; Wong T
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Jun; 34(6):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 36786511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of optimal cardiac resynchronization by vectors extracted from electrograms in dyssynchronous canine hearts.
    Engels EB; Strik M; van Middendorp LB; Kuiper M; Vernooy K; Prinzen FW
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 28(8):944-951. PubMed ID: 28467647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves left ventricular remodeling and function compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block.
    Lu D; Zhang H; Zhang H
    Heart Fail Rev; 2018 Nov; 23(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29968221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison between biventricular pacing and single site pacing in patients with poor ventricular function: a hemodynamic study.
    Varma C; O'Callaghan P; Rowland E; Mahon NG; Mckenna W; Camm AJ; Brecker SJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Feb; 26(2 Pt 1):551-8. PubMed ID: 12710313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical outcomes with synchronized left ventricular pacing: analysis of the adaptive CRT trial.
    Birnie D; Lemke B; Aonuma K; Krum H; Lee KL; Gasparini M; Starling RC; Milasinovic G; Gorcsan J; Houmsse M; Abeyratne A; Sambelashvili A; Martin DO
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Sep; 10(9):1368-74. PubMed ID: 23851059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vectorcardiography as a tool for easy optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in canine left bundle branch block hearts.
    van Deursen CJ; Strik M; Rademakers LM; van Hunnik A; Kuiper M; Wecke L; Crijns HJ; Vernooy K; Prinzen FW
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 5(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 22534251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with right ventricular sense triggered left ventricular pacing benefits for the hemodynamics compared with standard CRT for chronic congestive heart failure: A cross-over study.
    Pu LJ; Wang Y; Zhao L; Luo ZL; Hua BT; Han MH; Li SM; Yang J; Li L; Peng YZ; Guo T
    Cardiol J; 2015; 22(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25179313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determinants of the time-to-peak left ventricular dP/dt (Td) and QRS duration with different fusion strategies in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Odland HH; Holm T; Cornelussen R; Kongsgård E
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():979581. PubMed ID: 36186985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Larger interventricular conduction time enhances mechanical response to resynchronization therapy.
    Padeletti L; Pieragnoli P; Ricciardi G; Perrotta L; Perini AP; Grifoni G; Ricceri I; Padeletti M; Lionetti V; Valsecchi S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 36(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 23305325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Body surface mapping using an ECG belt to characterize electrical heterogeneity for different left ventricular pacing sites during cardiac resynchronization: Relationship with acute hemodynamic improvement.
    Johnson WB; Vatterott PJ; Peterson MA; Bagwe S; Underwood RD; Bank AJ; Gage RM; Ramza B; Foreman BW; Splett V; Haddad T; Gillberg JM; Ghosh S
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Mar; 14(3):385-391. PubMed ID: 27871987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Maximization of interventricular conduction time by means of quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Stabile G; Bianchi V; Solimene F; Iuliano A; Parisi Q; Pepi P; Bocchiardo M; Urraro F; De Simone A; Ospizio R; D'Onofrio A
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 50(1):111-115. PubMed ID: 28798987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrocardiographic follow-up of biventricular pacemakers.
    Barold SS; Herweg B; Giudici M
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2005 Apr; 10(2):231-55. PubMed ID: 15842437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A prospective, randomized comparison of the acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular and left ventricular pacing with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Gold MR; Niazi I; Giudici M; Leman RB; Sturdivant JL; Kim MH; Yu Y
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 May; 8(5):685-91. PubMed ID: 21193063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Left ventricular-only pacing in heart failure patients with normal atrioventricular conduction improves global function and left ventricular regional mechanics compared with biventricular pacing: an adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy sub-study.
    Burns KV; Gage RM; Curtin AE; Gorcsan J; Bank AJ
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1335-1343. PubMed ID: 28653458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.