These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28543307)

  • 1. A Bayesian approach to model the conditional correlation between several diagnostic tests and various replicated subjects measurements.
    Pereira da Silva HD; Ascaso C; Gonçalves AQ; Orlandi PP; Abellana R
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3154-3170. PubMed ID: 28543307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combination of five diagnostic tests to estimate the prevalence of hookworm infection among school-aged children from a rural area of colombia.
    Barreto RE; Narváez J; Sepúlveda NA; Velásquez FC; Díaz SC; López MC; Reyes P; Moncada LI
    Acta Trop; 2017 Sep; 173():160-170. PubMed ID: 28619671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
    Keddie SH; Baerenbold O; Keogh RH; Bradley J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling conditional dependence among multiple diagnostic tests.
    Wang Z; Dendukuri N; Zar HJ; Joseph L
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4843-4859. PubMed ID: 28875512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling conditional dependence between diagnostic tests: a multiple latent variable model.
    Dendukuri N; Hadgu A; Wang L
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):441-61. PubMed ID: 19067379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding the effects of conditional dependence in research studies involving imperfect diagnostic tests.
    Wang Z; Dendukuri N; Joseph L
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(3):466-480. PubMed ID: 27730659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Paul M; Riebler A; Bachmann LM; Rue H; Held L
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1325-39. PubMed ID: 20101670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.
    Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2149-65. PubMed ID: 20809538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
    Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests.
    Dendukuri N; Joseph L
    Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 11252592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests with intermediate results in the absence of a gold standard.
    Xu H; Black MA; Craig BA
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2571-84. PubMed ID: 23212851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian inference on mixed-effects location scale models with skew-t distribution and mismeasured covariates for longitudinal data.
    Lu T
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2614-2629. PubMed ID: 28421622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for a diagnostic test with a limit of detection in the absence of a gold standard.
    Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Utts JM; Gardner IA
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2090-106. PubMed ID: 20603894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Latent class models in diagnostic studies when there is no reference standard--a systematic review.
    van Smeden M; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 179(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 24272278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian estimation of diagnostic tests accuracy for semi-latent data with covariates.
    Martinez EZ; Achcar JA; Louzada-Neto F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):809-21. PubMed ID: 16078387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian hierarchical latent class models for estimating diagnostic accuracy.
    Wang C; Lin X; Nelson KP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1112-1128. PubMed ID: 31146651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold standard.
    Schofield MR; Maze MJ; Crump JA; Rubach MP; Galloway R; Sharples KJ
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(22):4751-4763. PubMed ID: 33990992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When do latent class models overstate accuracy for diagnostic and other classifiers in the absence of a gold standard?
    Spencer BD
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22017371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.