These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28543429)

  • 1. Earthquake insurance pricing: a risk-based approach.
    Lin JH
    Disasters; 2018 Apr; 42(2):392-404. PubMed ID: 28543429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Earthquake-strengthening policy for commercial buildings in small-town New Zealand.
    Filippova O; Noy I
    Disasters; 2020 Jan; 44(1):179-204. PubMed ID: 31231847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the seismic performance of isolated buildings according to life-cycle cost.
    Dang Y; Han JP; Li YT
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2015; 2015():495042. PubMed ID: 25653677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and present status of seismic evaluation and seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Japan.
    Okada T
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2021; 97(7):402-422. PubMed ID: 34380916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strength, functionality and beauty of university buildings in earthquake-prone countries.
    Wada A
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2018; 94(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 29434079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Specific seismic retrofitting of a compact reinforced concrete building with X-bracings and steel jackets. Application to a primary school in Huelva.
    Romero-Sánchez E; Morales-Esteban A; Requena-García-Cruz MV; Zapico-Blanco B; de-Miguel-Rodríguez J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238505. PubMed ID: 32915839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of catastrophe loss modelling to promote property insurance in developing countries.
    Zolfaghari MR
    Disasters; 2010 Apr; 34(2):524-41. PubMed ID: 20002708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structural challenges for seismic stability of buildings in hilly areas.
    Roshan P; Pal S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(44):99100-99126. PubMed ID: 36190625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing earthquake insurance programmes: how would Japan and California have fared after the 2010-11 earthquakes in New Zealand?
    Nguyen CN; Noy I
    Disasters; 2020 Apr; 44(2):367-389. PubMed ID: 31232483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Earthquake recovery of historic buildings: exploring cost and time needs.
    Al-Nammari FM; Lindell MK
    Disasters; 2009 Jul; 33(3):457-81. PubMed ID: 19178547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of injury pattern and entrapment location inside damaged buildings in the 2016 Taiwan earthquake.
    Pan ST; Cheng YY; Wu CL; Chang RH; Chiu C; Foo NP; Chen PT; Wang TY; Chen LH; Chen CJ; Ong R; Tsai CC; Hsu CC; Hsieh LW; Chi CH; Lin CH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2019 Jan; 118(1 Pt 2):311-323. PubMed ID: 29857951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pricing risk-based catastrophe bonds for earthquakes at an urban scale.
    Mistry HK; Lombardi D
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9729. PubMed ID: 35697744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The application of seismic risk-benefit analysis to land use planning in Taipei City.
    Hung HC; Chen LC
    Disasters; 2007 Sep; 31(3):256-76. PubMed ID: 17714167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Earthquake Damage Visualization (EDV) Technique for the Rapid Detection of Earthquake-Induced Damages Using SAR Data.
    Sharma RC; Tateishi R; Hara K; Nguyen HT; Gharechelou S; Nguyen LV
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 28134796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urban earthquake hazard: perceived seismic risk and preparedness in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.
    Paul BK; Bhuiyan RH
    Disasters; 2010 Apr; 34(2):337-59. PubMed ID: 19863568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seismic vulnerability assessment to earthquake at urban scale: A case of Mostaganem city in Algeria.
    Chaibedra B; Benanane A; Boutaraa Z
    Jamba; 2018; 10(1):473. PubMed ID: 29955262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of equity in resource allocation for regional earthquake risk mitigation using two-stage stochastic programming.
    Zolfaghari MR; Peyghaleh E
    Risk Anal; 2015 Mar; 35(3):434-58. PubMed ID: 25676412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MyShake: A smartphone seismic network for earthquake early warning and beyond.
    Kong Q; Allen RM; Schreier L; Kwon YW
    Sci Adv; 2016 Feb; 2(2):e1501055. PubMed ID: 26933682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of Building Safety Monitoring by Using Cost-Effective MEMS Accelerometers for Rapid After-Earthquake Assessment with Missing Data.
    Lin JF; Li XY; Wang J; Wang LX; Hu XX; Liu JX
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.