These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28543874)
1. Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging using hyaluronic acid fillers: Differences between monophasic and biphasic fillers. Kim MJ; Moon WJ; Hur MS; Han SH; Lee YW; Choe YB; Ahn KJ Skin Res Technol; 2018 Feb; 24(1):16-19. PubMed ID: 28543874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monophasic and Biphasic Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Esthetic Correction of Nasolabial Folds: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Huang Y; Zhang Y; Fei X; Fan Q; Mao J Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 46(3):1407-1422. PubMed ID: 35066619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy and safety of a monophasic hyaluronic acid filler in the correction of nasolabial folds: A randomized, multicenter, single blinded, split-face study. Kwon HJ; Ko EJ; Choi SY; Choi EJ; Jang YJ; Kim BJ; Lee YW J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 17(4):584-589. PubMed ID: 28913927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Durability of Three Different Types of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in Skin: Are There Differences Among Biphasic, Monophasic Monodensified, and Monophasic Polydensified Products? da Costa A; Biccigo DGZ; de Souza Weimann ET; Mercadante LM; Oliveira PRG; Prebianchi SB; Abdalla BMZ Aesthet Surg J; 2017 May; 37(5):573-581. PubMed ID: 27923810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of hyaluronic acid fillers by in vitro and in vivo testing. Park KY; Kim HK; Kim BJ J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2014 May; 28(5):565-8. PubMed ID: 23495913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monophasic versus biphasic hyaluronic acid filler for correcting nasolabial folds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ghaddaf AA; Aljefri YE; Alharbi FA; Sharif RK; Alnahdi WA; Baaqeel R J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Feb; 21(2):627-635. PubMed ID: 34817919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and durability of hyaluronic acid fillers for malar enhancement: A prospective, randomized, split-face clinical controlled trial. Jeong KH; Gwak MJ; Moon SK; Lee SJ; Shin MK J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(3):184-188. PubMed ID: 28135883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative split-face study of durational changes in hyaluronic acid fillers for mid-face volume augmentation. Park KY; Kim JM; Seok J; Seo SJ; Kim MN; Youn CS Dermatol Ther; 2019 Jul; 32(4):e12950. PubMed ID: 31025502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Myth of the "Biphasic" Hyaluronic Acid Filler. Öhrlund JÅ; Edsman KL Dermatol Surg; 2015 Dec; 41 Suppl 1():S358-64. PubMed ID: 26618465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the safety, efficacy, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid fillers in filler rhinoplasty: A multicenter study. Rho NK; Youn CS; Youn SJ; Lee S; Kim HS Dermatol Ther; 2021 Jan; 34(1):e14707. PubMed ID: 33368945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical properties of a novel small-particle hyaluronic acid filler: In vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies. Cho SY; Park JW; An H; Ko HJ; Kim H; Choi JK; Choi SY; Kim SM; Ko EJ; Kim BJ J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Jun; 17(3):347-354. PubMed ID: 29687569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine 0.3% in the correction of nasolabial fold. Suh JH; Oh CT; Im SI; Lim JS; Kim BJ; Lee JH J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(3):327-332. PubMed ID: 28145073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The selection of hyaluronic acid when treating with the nasolabial fold: A meta-analysis. Peng T; Hong WJ; Fang JR; Luo SK J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Feb; 21(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 35037733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative Evaluation of Volume Augmentation and Durational Changes in the Anteromedial Cheek with Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Using Three-Dimensional Measurement: 2-Year Results from a Comparative Split-Face Study. Hong JK; Park SJ; Seo SJ; Park KY; Youn CS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):87e-91e. PubMed ID: 35511071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of a monophasic cohesive polydensified matrix versus a biphasic nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid filler after single injection in nasolabial folds. Buntrock H; Reuther T; Prager W; Kerscher M Dermatol Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1097-105. PubMed ID: 23506356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effects of Subcutaneously Injected Novel Biphasic Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler: In Vivo Study. Hahn HM; Lee WB; Lee IJ Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Feb; 45(1):322-331. PubMed ID: 33174067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft Tissue Filler Properties Can Be Altered by a Small-Diameter Needle. Lee W; Oh W; Moon HJ; Koh IS; Yang EJ Dermatol Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 31634257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo bio-integration of three hyaluronic acid fillers in human skin: a histological study. Tran C; Carraux P; Micheels P; Kaya G; Salomon D Dermatology; 2014; 228(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 24503674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound patterns of different dermal filler materials used in aesthetics. Urdiales-Gálvez F; De Cabo-Francés FM; Bové I J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 May; 20(5):1541-1548. PubMed ID: 33641224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]